A Study On The History Of Contention In The History Of Entrepreneurship

Seventeen years as a classic "Pioneering" text in decades caused aliterary repeatedly contend not only with its rich reserves of politicalconnotations associated with its enduring artistic value but also haveclose ties. Whether you want to explore the details of the history ofliterature, or to summarize and reflect rational approach to literarycriticism, or to seek a richer laws of art,"Pioneering" is a very goodstudy. In this paper, on the one hand by studying the history of the casecriticized "Pioneering" to explore the whole of contemporary literarycriticism spiritual realism rheology; on the other hand want to criticizein the whole spirit of the rheology of candles to rethink the history ofcriticism "Pioneering" to obtain the moment of revelation.In this paper, the first chapter of "17-year period of" ideologicalbackground analysis, historical details and Yan Yan Liu Qing discussionand dialogue on the "middle person" Debates reflection, summed up by the"Pioneering" in the1960s by the refraction of contention Seventeen yearsout realism literary criticism ethos: it hovers between politics and artand form relationships with each other checks and balances realismliterature. Its trajectory is ultimately determined by the politicalforces. It also gives the current literary "art democracy" posed byreflection and enlightenment.The second chapter analyzes the ecological environment through thedevelopment of literature in the early1980s, on the "value ofagricultural co-fiction" contend discussion, thinking of the time closeto the "aesthetic theory of reflection" tendency criticism, summed up inthe early1980s "Pioneering" contend trajectory, as well as its value andinsufficient. Analysis from the contending track, we can explore the"Pioneering" as the representative of realism literary criticism is"negation of negation" of the exploration process matured, it reveals thecontinuity of the development of literary criticism, and promote thehistory of and foster a sense of the presence of dialectical thinking,expanding the criticism of the method. Judging from the limitations, itlacks the "reflective thoroughness" of the Current still haveenlightenment.The third chapter,"Rewriting Literary History" under field waves"Pioneering" the fate of the presentation, to rethink "what kind ofrewriting history Literature" and "How to rewrite the history ofliterature," how to objectively evaluate the willow Green issues. On thebasis of the above problems, the author further explore the meaning andcharacteristics of realism literary criticism, and reflect itslimitations."Reassessment" for realism literary criticism from closedto open, multi-valent to create good conditions, but its deconstructionand critical attitude way, they form a relationship with the initial pursuit Contrariety,"Rewriting the history of literature." is still farfrom complete a project.Finally, chapter by contending mining potential in the context of culturalpoetics posed "Pioneering", summed up several important direction"Pioneering" criticism: First, the "subjectivity demands" tendencies,the second is the sevent Reinterpretation of literary history in detail,and the third is to start "Pioneering" text and the current reality ofdialogue. Also constitute the relationship between the three directionsof dialogue and mutual candles out of their own limitations, which hasfar-reaching implications for realism literary criticism continue to moveforward.