A Study Of "Four Books Review"

Since song dynasty, the study of "four books" has been a cultural horizon of bearing point, to witness the moral system as well as the cognitive process of ancient intellectuals. Li Zhi study in view of the "four books", in accordance with the trust in knowledge development of the "four books" in the song dynasty, is the central issue of academic research. Li Zhi’s "four review is a classic in the late Ming, Li Zhi himself from the work of research as well as analysis of academic ideas, also can be the development of research thought of Ming dynasty. The development of academic thought of Ming dynasty, is a tortuous process "schools of thought contend", and no stable academic research situation, the value of top-down lack of a common identity. The four review with magnificent dialectical consciousness impact on the traditional Confucianism at that time, the value of washing the intellectuals to accept and laws system. Li Zhi with a strong sense of dialectical criticism on the "four books", for at that time have had sex extremely, but restricted by time, inevitably has some limitations, but does not affect our analysis and study of Li Zhi academic thought, also does not affect the value of the four review of identity.Li Zhi’s "The four books reviews" to grand dialectical consciousness impact to the traditional Confucianism at that time, the value of washing the intellectuals with laws system, Li Zhi with a strong sense of dialectical criticism on the" four books ", for the most advanced, but restricted by time, inevitably has some limitations, but does not affect our analysis and study of Li Zhi academic thought, also does not affect the value of the four review of identity. In the book, he boldly from a new Angle for the feudal rule as the "four books" for his criticism of treasures, the thought of "against the hole" sessions. Li Zhi in the’The four books reviews" to show, is against hole against Confucianism, on the one hand and on the other hand is to give praise and affirmation that Confucius and mencius. It is important to note that this is not to say that Li Zhi is a two-faced person, he rejected not Confucianism, but those with a "sage" coat actually without to learn "moralists" advocate "doublespeak". Due to the limit of Li Zhi’s social status and historical environment of the Ming dynasty, "The four books reviews" of inevitable also existed shortcomings, but in spite of his flaws, his fearless and anti-feudal spirit deeply engraved in "The four books reviews".This article mainly includes five aspects:The first part is the introduction. This section of the first section explains "The four books reviews of research" research significance; The second section provides an overview of academic research situation, including for Li Zhi personally as well as the study of "The four books reviews"; The third section expounds this topic, the research methods and research ideas.The second part is a brief introduction to the author of Li Zhi and "The four books reviews". The first section is a general introduction of Li Zhi’s life, so as to explore the main cause of Li Zhi character formation; The second section is an overview of Li Zhi academic thought; The third section is a brief introduction to "The four books reviews" as. The fourth part is the version and the style of "The four books reviews" to introduce.The third part is jiagan of The four books reviews". About the author of four books, Li Zhi, whether there is a dispute, now the academic circles has so before make to study on the four review, distinguishes clearly the author who is very necessary. This section of the first quarter put forward educational world about the dispute of the authors of four review, there are two, Li Zhi, the first is that the author is representative scholars for Hou Wailu, Huang Zheng. The second is that the author Ye Wentong, representative scholars such as Cui Wenyin, Ye Lang people; The second part describes the attitude and the author thinks that the basis of "four books" written by Li Zhi, one of reasons is filled in, say no theory according to the second reason is the four review of Li Zhi other works style is consistent, and the third reason is the four review content accord with Li Zhi’s thought tendency.The fourth part for the four review of research. This section of the first quarter of the four review on the research of the "university", including "The four books reviews" of research on "university" of the text structure and the thought research; Second quarter for "The four books reviews" on the study of "the doctrine of the mean", including "The four books reviews" on the research of the "from", the study of "dao not far from the people" and the study of "to ChengDa way"; Third quarter for "The four books reviews" of the study of the analects of Confucius, including "The four books reviews" of study on "the analects" education thought, gentleman’s view, filial piety and people-oriented thoughts of research; For the fourth quarter of" The four books reviews" on the study of "mencius", including "four books" to "mencius" theory of benevolent governance research, theory of human nature, combination and filial piety.The fifth part on the review of four characteristics and deficiencies. Although" The four books reviews" existed shortcomings, but in spite of his flaws, it is the light shine out cannot be concealed.