A Case Study Of Haitian County Government In Qing Dynasty

Seashore Confucian Lan Dingyuan life full of ups and downs, lost his father atan early age, and do not try first, until Yong Zheng two years before in bagong.However, the examination room on the misfortune did not stop the heart of the worldand helping people. Lan Dingyuan in the so-called sea of Chaozhou office, Chaoyangand Puning County, control of the refractory two clean government, longer than thetrial of litigation. In his book Lu Zhou Gong An, Lan Dingyuan detailing his handlingof a difficult case in magistrate of a county next thing. In these cases, there are threethings is particularly prominent, respectively, on god encourages, Songshi andthieves. Which three things are three basis points, the author make a point of trying tolook from these three things XianYa prison suit some core problems in the QingDynasty.The full text consists of the introduction, text and the conclusion three parts.The introduction: Are mainly introduced in this paper, the origin, researchsummary and research method.The first chapter: Customs of coastline in the Qing Dynasty. The author thinksthat Chaozhou as a coastal land, the customs is mainly reflected in three aspects: oneis to believe in ghosts, people wizard; two are litigiosity habit, legal cases multiple;three is the bandits, Hao Jiang illegal.All these constitute the important background ofLan Dingyuan court judgement.The second chapter: Lan Dingyuan and Lu Zhou Gong An. One is the briefintroduction of seashore Confucian Lan Dingyuan’s academic thought and theachievement, two of the Lu Zhou Gong An of the historical value and the specificcases are analyzed.The third chapter: Ghosts and gods, divine judgment and Xianya lawsuits.Divided into four parts. One is the Chaozhou area supernatural beliefs to be discussed,analyzed the relationship between the two is the judgment of God and human judgement, three is the combination of God Lu Zhou Gong An concrete in the case ofthe City God, Sanshan king in Lan Dingyuan cases were analyzed, four is the analysisof the reasons from the view of legal culture of God sentenced to work.The fourth chapter: Gentry, Songshi and Xianya lawsuits. Divided into threeparts. It is briefly introduced the ancient Songshi and litigation culture, two is to carryon the key analysis for an important group of gentry Songshi source, discusses itsparticipation in the litigation mode and the reasons, three is from that of suit mongers.The lawyer from that in the operation, analyzes the Songshi abetting people falselyaccused and ghouls blackmail the two litigation strategy, and on behalf of Songshiand official finches rats litigation and Gan Tang proceeding of the two different legalconcept to analysis.The fifth chapter: The thieves, Baojia and Xianya lawsuits. Divided into fourparts. One is from the Qing Dynasty governance provisions of thief prevention andcontrol system and the Qing Law punish the thieves, briefly introduces thehigh-pressure situation for the governance of the Qing Dynasty and malpractice. Twois the attention and force for the BaoJia system in Qing Dynasty is importantsupplement for the governance of the country was. The three is from the practice ofLan Dingyuan governance rogue specifically study the theft of control. The four is theanalysis of specific reasons for thieves to effective governance.The conclusion: The author thinks that should play a historical imagination forLan Dingyuan the trial of litigation, sympathise with the attitude, in the situation to beunderstood.