Study On Serive Evluation And Selection For Third Party Logistics Providers Base On AHP Model

With the rapid development of industrial technology and the increasing economic globalization, social division of labor and specialization of the deepening and acceleration of an increasingly competitive market, any enterprise can not or difficult to maintain and have a high degree of long-term comprehensive comparative advantage competitiveness, comprehensive and rational use of resources and outsourcing non-core business is the important mean to maintain and continuously improve the competitiveness of enterprises. Meanwhile, with the economic development of modern logistics as an economic and efficient operation, with the increasing demand of logistics service, the third party logistics enterprises have gradually become the focus of attention and rely on. Experience shows that orderly and efficient third party logistics activities for enhancing their core competitiveness, optimizing internal and external resources, reduce operating costs, improve service levels. However, whether these functions of third-party logistics can fully meet demand, largely depend on the level of the operation of logistics and implementation capacity, and determine the level of the operation of logistics and implementation capacity will need a complete set of systematic evaluation and selection.Company C for the actual third-party logistics providers are facing in the process of cooperation in the case, especially in the choice of logistics providers and evaluated, it is difficult really to the logistics supply business level, strength and quality of service to be comprehensive, reliable, accurate understanding and grasp, which led to these problems are the main point is the evaluation of company C of the current selection method has limitations to some extent, superficial signs of obvious for the importance of the specific service priorities are not clearly defined, and the business needs of the actual matching is not very high, the same is not very feasible, so come to the conclusions of the assessment accordingly often debatable, but this conclusion, based on established measures for improving the implementation is difficult to be specific. Company C is currently the specific problems encountered are often interrelated reasons, so prioritize and determine the order to solve the problem is the formation of specific solutions to the key, and the existing evaluation findings can not support this critical point, so, whether conclusions of the assessment or remedial measures can not be consensus between the partners, and in practical cooperation will become a C Corporation and logistics providers the focus of conflict. Therefore, companies can build the C accurate and appropriate to the actual implementation of effective third-party logistics providers for its evaluation and selection models become the key logistics co-operation with the three points, this is a great practical significance and is yet to be resolved. This article is based on C Company of the evaluation of third-party logistics provider selection under the conditions of their environment, and research focused on the third-party logistics providers in the evaluation and selection methods.First, the three logistics providers and performance management theories and methods, and from C Company of the actual needs and problems currently facing, adopting the linear weight method to C Company existing third-party logistics providers to make initial and conducted research and improve practical application, so C company's assessment of the supplier further tend to be reasonable and complete. The availability of the index weight, based on the use of linear weighting method were calculated and obtained more reasonable than the original conclusions of the evaluation and selection. Then, by studying the analytic hierarchy process to solve the many interrelated factors that constitute a complex system of quantitative data in decision-making and make the sort of problem C company's choice of modeling performance evaluation becomes simple and practical and can have a strong operational. In the original performance of logistics service quality based on the increased level of logistics strategies and systems, and operation of the service and support these two new assessment level, and accordingly determined based on AHP theory of enterprise performance evaluation weight, building-level analysis model proposed AHP based business to choose third-party logistics providers in the comprehensive evaluation model.Furthermore, by studying the relationship between the group AHP has a solution for complex systems arise because of personal factors determine the bias. In the above companies has been completed on the AHP model based on an increase in identified four from experts in different departments within the company to determine the weight of the evaluation model used to set specific conditions on the C applied research company , Judgement Matrix in all the circumstances known to the implementation of each expert AHP comparison matrix to calculate the total level of sort weights obtained for different levels of experts, the total synthesis of sort weights, the final total ranking have the right to comprehensive value. Applied and obtained more reasonable, objective and consistent with C company's actual results.The paper close with the actual operating level requirements and characteristics of index weight method and by AHP based logistics provider established the principle of service evaluation system, the original company in the C logistics service providers based on the assessment of quality performance, the new logistics strategies and systems and operational services and support are two key aspects of the evaluation factors. Starting from the three main factors, and their respective evaluation of specific indicators were included to start in order to build a third-party logistics supplier evaluation index system and the hierarchical structure were calculated and conclusions of the analysis, and further removed by the group AHP arising due to personal factors determine the bias in the case of C Company to obtain the empirical applications and achieved good results. Therefore, this construct the evaluation index system and application method can also be third-party logistics service for enterprises to conduct a comprehensive evaluation service provides a reference.