| Weak agricultural foundation and characteristics of the decision of the Financial Fund for Agriculture is an important guarantee for the development of agricultural economy, while the efficiency of financial support for agriculture has been the focus of international academic circles. Three-quarters of the total population of farmers in China's basic national conditions, so the "three rural" issue at any moment will be the subject of fiscal policy priorities. As the 2008 international financial crisis deepens, spending more and more attention of the media by all parties. At the same time as the western development and an important bastion of economic integration in Southeast Asia, the southwest border of Yunnan, agricultural production is the basis for the protection of national stability, but also the cornerstone of western economic development. At this stage, how to adjust and regulate the financial support for agriculture policy in Yunnan Province, is a strong practical significance.This reference to the domestic and international financial support for agriculture in the theory and data model, access to public finance, public choice and transfer payments in particular on financial support for agriculture and other related theories, for the following financial support for agriculture to provide a theoretical basis for quantitative analysis. The one hand, while spending on financial support for agriculture in Yunnan Province longitudinal time series, Yunnan Province and the country's financial support for agriculture over the years were analyzed cross the other hand, expenditure of Yunnan Agricultural Economic Growth and the efficiency of an empirical analysis, and financial support for agriculture model reflected the economic significance of the various factors are described in detail. Conclusion: In addition to capital expenditure on agriculture has a negative economic significance of agricultural output, the other three financial support for agriculture (including forestry, water conservancy meteorological costs, support costs and Expenditure for rural production) are positive economic significance of agriculture . Finally, the model was improved and modified, more effective financial support for agriculture reflects the economic significance of various factors. The empirical results show that the addition of Yunnan Agricultural Agriculture Finance capital expenditures, the funds are on financial support for agriculture to increase agricultural output value is the economic significance, are not different; from the aggregate analysis results, Yunnan Agriculture Finance and provincial areas is not very different than the country. However, the four agro Fiscal breakdown of view, the uneven distribution of the different phenomena such as growth still exists, the individual financial support for agriculture occupies a larger proportion of the funds, while others reflected from the model has a positive economic significance the funds of financial support for agriculture has not been a corresponding expansion. This fully reflects the efficiency of Yunnan Province, Fiscal policy issues. Finally, according to the defects and deficiencies exposed, derivative financial system in Yunnan Province that superficial advice and insights. |
