| The legal case of deliberate injury is one of the most familiar cases that relate to Human body injury. There are four consequences for it, namely, slight injury, light injury,grievous bodily injury and manslaughter. These consequences can only be testimony in law suits after the forensic experts have made the examinations according to law.The examinations of slight injury, light injury,grievous bodily injury are called injury examinations.The different consequence of injury examination will lead to distinct punishment for behaving person. This thesis makes a deep research in the conflicts between time limit for handling a case and the time need for making a examination in the aspects that closely related to injury examinations, like the procedure of examination, criterion of examination, and efficacy of examination. These ensure the forensic experts to make just, objective, accurate injury examinations and provide much more scientific testimony for handling the case of deliberate injury.This essay is composed by introduction, body and conclusion. There are five parts in the section of body. In the first part, it demonstrates the the case of deliberate injury, the function of the consequence of injury that plays in the case of deliberate injury and the classification of the degree of injury to human body. In the second part, after demonstrating the issues that existed in the procedures of examining system of medical jurisprudence, the author offers his reasonable suggestions. In the third part, start with the existence examining criterion of slight injury, grievous bodily injury, the author points out its deficiency and limitation and then the author offers some piece of pointed suggestions for the reform of the examining criterion of the injury degree of human body. In the forth part, after introducing the time needs of the examination of medical jurisprudence and its conflict with the time limit of handling a case, the author offers his legislative suggestions of exclude the time needs of the examintion of medical jurisprudence from the time limit of handling a case. In the fifth part, after introducing and analyzing two totally different conceptions of effect of injury examination, namely, the theory of effect inequality and the theory of effect equality, the author affirm the theory of effect equality.The innovation point of this task's research is through the careful observation of the issues that exist in the judicatory practice of injury examination in our country nowadays, the author offers a corresponding... |