Rural Children Left Behind Psychological Flexibility And General Self-efficacy, Attributional Style Relations

This research takes country parent-absent children as the target aspect. Using Scale of the Healthy Kids Resilience Assessment, General Self-efficacy, Multidimensional-Multiattributional Causality. About 234 country parent-absent children take part in the study. This study tries to find out the relationship among parent-absent children's resiliency, general self-efficacy and attribution style. And also compare their different in the entire demographic variables.First, there are no significant difference in the entire demographic variables in resiliency and general self-efficacy. But there are significant age difference, grade difference and keeper difference in attribution style.Second, correlative analysis indicates that there exists remarkable positive correlation between resiliency and general self-efficacy. Further study finds that between effort attribution and resilience revising a significant positive correlation; there is a significant negative correlation among luck attribution, background attribution and resilience. In success and failure attribution there is a very significant positive correlation between effort attribution and resilience, in the failure attribution there is a significant negative correlation among capacity attribution, luck attribution and resilience.Third, the general self-efficacy, internal attribution and effort attribution have a significant positive effect to resilience. Background attribution has a negatively predicate to resilience. Effort attribution for success and capacity attribution for failure have a significant positive effect to resilience; the background and capacity attribution for failure have a significant negative predicate to resilience.Fourth, there are significantly different between the high and low resilience group of parent-absent children's general self-efficacy and attribution style. The high resilience group of parent-absent children's general self-efficacy is higher than the low. And the high resilience group than the low resilience group is more likely to do internal attribution. And the low resilience group than the high resilience group tends to set the background attribution. In the attribution of failure, the high resilience group than in the group with low resilience is more inclined to do effort attribution.