| With decades of years' history in the field of language learner's error analysis study, researchers, from different starting points, have studied various kinds of the categories of language learner's errors, from early Constructive Analysis , Error Analysis to later Interlanguage Analysis. However, most results may just instruct teaching and error correcting in a single way. Therefore, it is fairly important to study language learner's errors and teacher's corrections on an overall and systematic view.Based on Corder's systematic categories of Error Analysis, and the construction studies between various sorts of classifications of language learner's errors worldwide and Corder's systematic Error Analysis, carrying out language learner's presystematic errors, systematic errors and postsystematic errors from multi-angles respectively, finding the teacher's correcting has different effect and necessity, during the development of language learner's interlanguage, puts forward that teacher's correcting to presystematic errors has a little effect and necessity; teacher's correcting to systematic errors has great effect and necessity and teacher' correcting to postsystematic errors has quite a little, even negative effect and no necessity.With the rapid development of psycholinguistics, cognitive linguistics, sociolinguistics and so on, the study of Error Analysis has turned to deductive methods from inductive methods. As a result, it is worthwhile to precede Error Analysis from multi-dimensions. In the interest of guiding the teaching better and showing the unique applied value of Error Analysis, it is very necessary to get the whole picture of both the development of language learner's interlanguage and the related issues completely, further, and multi-dimensionally. |