Qu Qiubai Art To Explore The Relationship With The Soviet Union Left-wing Thought

With literature and art, the exploration of Chinese modernization progress is the motive of Qu Qiubai to carry on the literary and artistic activities. As a result, the choice of the modernization's way does necessarily influence on the Qu Qiubai's standpoint on the literature and art. Qu Qiubai became a Marxism literature theorist after he had chosen the way of Marxism of Soviet Union and Russia. The change is showed in two aspects. The dissertation will separately discuss them in two chapters.The first chapter discusses the problem of anti- Europeanization. Qu Qiubai was firmly against to the Europeanization, though he had advocated the Europeanized enlightenment on his early stage. The way of modernization of Marxism of Soviet Union was different from the European capitalist reform, therefore it also opposed to the ideas of democracy and science of capitalist in literature and art. Qu Qiubai accepted the whole sorts of these value senses, so he opposed to the "enlightenment" that was advocated during the New culture movement period. The social function was not against to the convention, but also opposed to the Europeanization. The influence on Qu Qiubai was that he did not consider the Marxism as the part of the enlightenment, in contrast, he thought the relationship between each other was opposite. The change made Qu understand the view of literature and art more thoroughly, and it also made him overlook the objective evaluation and acceptation to theleft trend of thought in the Soviet Union and Chinese literature.The second chapter discusses the problem of mass literature and art. The way of modernization selected by Qu made his attention transform from "elite literature and art " to "mass literature and art". But Qu Qiubai, who emerging from the traditional culture, could not really accept the "mass literature art" advocated by himself. It took the tremendous contradiction to the psychological and literary criticism, that make him found his personality was split. It reminds us, the way of "mass literature and art" is not the suitable method to deal with the relationship between traditional culture and foreign natural resources, what's more, the resources accepted in the standard of "mass literature and art" are not the original appearanceof Soviet Union literature and art.