Tomb Of Xinyang Long Close First Research On The Nature Of The School Of Bamboo

Two sets of bamboo slips are unearthed in No.l Tomb in Hsinyang, the first group is bamboo book, and the second set is the task list, which is no objection in the academic field. But the school of thought bamboo slip belongs to is still in dispute. Conclusively, There are three viewpoints.The first, the thoughts belongs to Confuction doctrine. Mr. Li Xueqin initiated, but give up later, which is demonstrated by Mr. Yang Zhesheng.The second, Mr. Li Xueqin holds that there are Mo Zi lost essay instead of Confuction doctrine. The third, different to Mr. Li and Mr. Yang,Mr. Liling disagree it is the work of the Pre-Qin Scholars, he said tha it should be the kind of the Question-answer between Zhou Gong and shentu di, and in a single piece of ancient books spread.In these views of the nature of bamboo, Li Xueqin's opinion from beginning to end, is subject to academic attention:from the early days of Confucian say to the the One-side Mo Zi lost essay, people have no objection. It can be said that until Mr. liling publish the study of shentu di, this problem is put forward again. While Yang remention the bamboo slip belongs to Confucianism, then the question become more complicated. So, on this issue, It has evolved to the Situation of three Kingdoms' Tripartite:Mo Zi lost article, single spread, Confuction doctrine. Three doctrines have their standpoints. Which doctrine was right? In order to untie this puzzle, we have to ponde the above-mentioned three doctrines.So, my discussion is focused on the correlational research of Li Xueqin, liling and Yang Zhesheng, Hackling it clearly from the word explanations,tomb age to the school of thought bamboo slip belongs to and so on.Beginning with a talk about the word explanations. In this point, the majority of scholars is not so far apart, but Mr. He Linyi breaking new ground. Although Mr.He put forward fresh views, the meaning is not big for the judgement of the nature of bamboo from the provision of creative writing. Because the interpreted result is still the Question-answer between Zhou Gong and shentu di,both of them have the different opinion and debated with controversy. Tt is no differencee with others. Since the hero does not change, the key idea of the dialogue has not changed, the proposal which want to express is also not change,so there can be no meaning. Currently, As the Interpretation of simple text, although make every word is accurate like "mount tai is hard to shif'is sitill a little difficult,but the context has rude understandabl. This part of Jane Wen should be a dialogue between between Zhou Gong and a man who called "yi", which was mainly around the "slut" in whether there are wise men, and how to treat these "slut of the wise men" started. We consolidated all opinions,and then make the conclusion that No.1 Tomb in Hsinyang should be the tomb of forward and backward in Warring States PeriodWith regard to the nature of the bamboo slips, in the beginning, Mr Li Xueqin put it to Confucian doctrine, and then refer to Mohist School doctrine on the base of the Mo Zi lost essay from Confucianism dialogue forms in Tai Ping Yu Lan which was found by institute of Zhongshan scholar; Mr. Yang Zhesheng said that the search direction of Mr Li Xueqin from bamboo slip's ideological content and wording used habit is correct. Therefore, the argument of Mr. young also elaboratet in this two parts. We used a review and found bothLi and yang's study have insufficient evidence, even on the logic of the argument is not none. We also found that three of the slightly different. Li Xueqin, Yang taek two gentleman on their respective viewpoints fairly confident, tone is in the affirmative; and Mr. liling is heuristically in Mr. Li Xueqin made another possibility. Through research, we found that Li Xueqin, Yang taek two gentleman is assured because pre-Qin and ancient books complexity estimation. In that sense, the study of Mr. liling played a check out to repair the effects. Of course, As far as the pleiotropia which was reflected by xinyang bamboo is concerned, every school is possibilities. However, The literature which scholars masterd is also little.so we can not have a solid conclusion. three are certain possibilities about lost article said, single pop said, Confucian, so It is better to exist this there opinion.Through the study on Xinyang bamboo, this article also want to provide a way of thinking about pre-Qin literature,that is to say, how to deal with the problem that is about the multidimensionality of conclusions for the refraining of materials, undering the case of lacking of literature and the study of the history of pre-Qin and literature without usefull matrials. In my opinion, on one hand, we should make more aspects of possibily study, under the allow of materials. If there is no conclusive evidences, we should be care of the speaking or suspected to be cautious in existence. Perhaps, this did not appear to bescheduled for a straightforward, even added some chaos, but as researchers, this is no way of things. Because even if a certain tendency,, already there is "very joy", please tell us about yourself, but you still want to hold the final hurdle, because the material there. We have to do is start from the material, as in "to know" and so deep into the material of the "internal logic", it was thus possible to reproduce the original material can be extremely complex face. Therefore, it seems at a loss, no conclusions conclusions, but may reflect the more objective, careful research attitude, precisely in line with the history of "objective" requirements. And to address the doubts, seek a definitive conclusion, but a face history, but history is not the only and highest for this purpose.