On The Proof Of Civil Action In Virtual Property

With the rapid development of network economy, the Internet population growing, Internet users can work, study, entertainment and other activities through the Internet, it has gradually become an indispensable part of people’s life. Network technology is a double-edged sword, it provide convenience for People’s Daily work life at the same time bring new challenges to modern legal system. In the virtual world web users often because of its virtual items such as QQ account, game equipment is stolen or lost caused disputes. But, at present our country no legislation of network virtual property disputes made specific provision, sparked trading or loss in the network virtual property disputes, often because of burden of proof is difficult to be solved. Therefore, clarifying the particularity of virtual property disputes proof, on the basis of perfecting the protection of virtual property corresponding way is very urgent and realistic. Articles from Li Hong v. arctic ocean network company’s case the burden of proof, the distribution of the first analysis of the case reveals a variety of legal problems, and then describes the type and nature of virtual property dispute on distribution of burden of proof, the influence of the final combined with the characteristics of virtual property, and the difference between operators and players ability to collect evidence, to our country network game virtual property litigation proof of the corresponding perfecting suggestion. Specifically, the imputation principle of legal cope with the new disputes made specific provision, clear disputes the parties shall bear the burden of proof, and initiative to create a third party database to provide electronic data storage service. Gradually build network operations industry self-discipline mechanism, so as to strengthen the prevention of network virtual property disputes. Hope that in this case the solution of the problem in the virtual property disputes can play some help later.