A Study On The Positive Interaction Between Media And Justice

In China, with the news media, freedom of consciousness and supervision of consciousness, media coverage of judicial activities have become increasingly frequent. Meanwhile, the legal issues between the media and the judiciary both resulting also caused widespread concern of scholars and the public. Construction of Positive Interactive Media and justice has become the main theme of the relationship between the media and the judiciary healthy. Freedom of the press and an independent judiciary are the most representative of the fundamental values of democracy and the rule of law, these two values in the criminal justice integration and conflict as the media coverage of judicial interaction with bridges embodied particularly prominent. Based on the basis of media freedom and the right to obtain the right coverage, in order to supervise the judicial activities. But also based on their judicial organs of state property or restrictions of the criminal justice response to reports. On the status of our criminal justice reports analyzed,combined with this status quo in which interactive media and judiciary, the media and the judiciary on the positive interaction of improvement has important theoretical and practical significance.This paper consists of an introduction and five chapters composed of other chapters.First chapter by three cases to elicit the background and purpose of the research, then describes the current situation of domestic research and research methods.The second chapter describes the definition and scope of the criminal justice reporting. "Justice" within the definition of the word, there are many, the author of the selected cases are due at the end of the first trial the prosecution stage to stage, so this will be defined as a generalized justice said. At the same time the media for this article, the author analyzes the mainstream media just as Xinhua and the local newspaper, the other is not in-depth analysis. Finally, by analyzing the basic rights of the criminal justice reporting and conflict with other powers, in order to analyze the interaction of the media coverage of criminal justice and Justice: Media judicial supervision, judicial response to the media.Chapter III of the present situation and the reasons for our criminal justice reports were analyzed. There are activities that fit with the criminal justice side of another conflict right side of the conflict based on different reports of criminal justice. But freedom of the press and an independent judiciary are fundamental values ??of democracy and the rule of law, so the boundaries of media and judicial interaction should be a democratic rule of law.Chapter IV of the extraterritorial experience and the Legislation analyzed.Analysis of the foreign judicial systems and procedures spokesman speech restriction rules. In order to draw inspiration for our country, our judiciary should rationally face justice, but also benign specification published proceedings,criminal justice acquisition balance reported.Chapter V of the perfect interaction of media reports of criminal justice and the judiciary made some suggestions. After selecting the macro principle, the two specifications for improving the relationship between the media and judicial normative documents presented some views and learn from America’s "Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct" in the hope of our program to further improve the regulation of speech outside, in order to improve the judicial response to the media. We also hope to further discipline by the media, to improve the supervision of the media. In order to make our criminal justice reporting rules to further improve the construction of interactive media and judicial benign.