On The Identification Of Civil Judicature

Along with society’s progress and development, in the practice of civil litigation evidence in the form of increasingly volatile, there are new cases in the judicial practiceevery day, the emergence of new content needs to judge the referee and review evidence. Appraisal standard authentication institutions emerge in endlessly, and it is too complicated. Appraisement is becoming more and more professional, it puts forward the new requirements of modern judicial judgment. If not accurate appraisal opinions of appraisal institution to make certification review, evidence will violate the basic requirement of the objectivity, authenticity, damage the lawful rights and interests of the parties, the serious influence of justice, reducing the efficiency of lawsuit. Evaluation of the complex form of evidence and the judge’s judicial trial, to some extent, it can be said to be to serve the lawsuit activity, through judicial appraisal of expert opinion, as one of the judicial practice of evidence, it should be a judge of the trial, and is not a barrier to affect the judicial justice. Refinement of expert witnesses refused to testify in the opinions of legal responsibility, improve the identification authentication procedures, clear expert auxiliary views of legal effect, these three measures are conducive to the timely and effective to protect the lawful rights and interests of the parties, so as to better resolve social disputes, sets up the judicial authority.