The Standardization And Countermeasure Of Anonymous Report In The Work Of Discipline Inspection And Supervision

In the work of anti-corruption, the masses report is the important clues for Disciplinary Inspection Department to discover actions of breaking law and regulation. From the point of an informer’s true identity, the reporting ways can be divided to real-name report and anonymous Report. Compared with the real-name report, anonymous Report not only reduces the overall value of clues, as well as not to conducive to protecting the legitimate rights and interests of informants, but also leads to "Selective law enforcement", causing the corruption of power. There is also trouble in practice when Disciplinary inspection department handle with anonymous Report. Anonymous report will not only disturb the order of the normal work of the Discipline Inspection Department, causing social negative evaluation on the Discipline Inspection Department, but also be easy to become tools for people to seek improper interests. Although in our county anonymous report has experienced the process from absolutely forbidden to legal recognition, but in essence it is a kind of non-standard report form. Because it doesn’t conform to the requirement of procedural justice, and also breaks social order, what’s worse it can make the informer to avoid legal obligations. In practice work for the sake of increasing the rate of real-name report,Disciplinary Inspection Department should make efforts to promote real-name report and learn from the successful experience at home and abroad about how to protect the legitimate rights and interests of informants. It should take measures to reduce the risk of revenge,such as single contacting informants, clarifying false report,seriously resourcing obligations of false accusation, which will try to realize effective standard and appropriately handle with anonymous report.