Briber Legislation Review - Black Whistle Events Triggered By Thinking

The criminal law field has different attitudes towards how to deal with the behavior of "black whistle". The reason is that there aren't perfect regulations about the body of bribery in the criminal law. With the development of the economy, the form of the body of bribery appears to be various, and the regulation in criminal law has fallen behind the necessity of the society. The discussion arising from the case of Gong Jianping is one epitome of such fact. In order to take effective measures to punish the spreading and severe bribery crime, the countries all over the world tend to expand the scope of the body of bribery. The body of bribery not only includes the officials, but also includes the people who don't have the administrative status, but engage the public affairs, and the semi-official servant, even is broaden to include the deputy. In a word, the scope of the body of bribery is very large. At the same time, most countries have established the standard, that is "public affairs", which can be used to judge the body of bribery in the criminal law. This offers a model for our country to define the scope of the body of bribery in our country. From comparative criminal law, I try to review the regulations about the body of bribery. Through introducing the legislative situation about the body of bribery abroad, I hope I can give some useful advices about how to modify and perfect the criminal law.