Nature Analysis Of Football Field Bribery Class Crime

Gong Jianping cases from the year to constantly expose of corruption cases inrecent years, a football anti-corruption storm blowing in our country. With Nan Yong,Yang Yimin, Xie Yalong, Football Association officials, Lu Jun, Huang Junjie, ZhouWeixin, and Wan Daxue football referee, Shen Si, Qi Hong and other players, such assuper company CEOs Lu Feng Jia Xiuquan such as coaches have arrestedor imposescriminal penalties for identity whether it be criminal penalties, or to what charges willbe punished, become a problem worthy of attention and study.This paper is divided into four chapters, the specific content:The first chapter is mainly to identify the nature of the Football Association staffbribes. The first section is the nature of the finds of the Chinese Football Association,through the identification of the nature of the Chinese Football Association to elicithow to confirm the identity of the Football Association staff. The second sectiondescribed for the fines imposed by the Court of Justice on the Football Associationstaff on recent analysis of the debatable penalty which, as a qualitative identity of theFootball Association staff. The third section Football is described how to identifyAssociation staff that both bribery and dereliction of duty.The second chapter is to identify the nature of the football referee took bribes.The first section is a football referee bribes qualitative theory controversial. Thesecond section is the referee does not belong to the state staff to conduct feasibilitystudies. In this section focuses on why the theory of double standards as therecognized standard of the national staff, as well as by the double standard theory tothe the specific argumentation referee does not belong to the national staff. The thirdsection is that football referee does not belong to the quasi-state staff to conductfeasibility studies. Introduced by the definition of the quasi-national staff to whoshould be recognized as a national staff, and should be limited to the scope ofapplication of the national staff, why the referee ruled out in a quasi-national staff as discussed. And the forth section clarify why the referee to be classified asnon-national staff.The third chapter is to identify the nature of the bribes to the participants of thesoccer such as players, football club, middleman. The first section is the nature of thefootballer bribes identified. Through the recent footballer judgment, leads to thejudgment the existence of contradictions. The reason for concluding that the footballerbribery should be excluded from the non-national staff taking bribes beyond thestarting point and the contradictions that exist in the range of specific analysis andjudgment of the identity of the Criminal Law of Central African States staff. But notonly taking into account the common bribery main different identity, but also theremay be the case of common crime. The second section is the identification of thenature of the football club bribes. To identify the nature of the football club and tookbribes behavior is illegal. The third section is the identification of the nature of theintermediary bribery class body. Intermediaries and bribery are said interesting andwhether to receive benefits as a starting point, and intermediaries in order to identifywhether the crime.The fourth chapter is a football field of bribery class Legislation of the perfectcrime. The first section is the legal regulation of foreign crime on the football field.The second section is the legal regulation of the crimes of our country on the footballfield. Through our existing laws to find our country’s laws or there are significantdefects in competitive sports. The third section is legislative proposals for how toimprove China’s legal.