Contract Fraud And Contract Fraud Boundaries Of Study

The crime of contract swindle and the act of contract fraud seem very much like, but in fact these two acts are different in nature and must not be treated in the same way. The author of the present will discuss the distinction between the crime of contract swindle and the act of contract fraud in three ways: the first part will deal with the conception and the component of these two acts; the second part will cover with the distinction in subjective concern and in objective concern between the crime of contract and the act of contract fraud as the main concern of the part; the third part will include problems how to identify the crime of contract swindle and the act of contract fraud. In this part, firstly the author define the criterion to distinguish between two different types of acts, the criterion is to certain whether the actor has the purpose of illegal possession or not, then the author believe that correct judgment about the purpose of illegal possession should stem from thorough investigation and study, thorough the method of synthetically analyses. In addition, the author puts forward a proposal to perfect the legislation of the crime of contract swindle.