| Pure economic loss is the popular topic in modem comparative law. This article mainly surrounds two questions about pure economic loss to third party without contract with defendant: whether this pure economic loss should be compensated and how to compensate it. This article compared the related systems about a few main nations, to put forward some suggestions about our country how to resolve this problem.In addition to the preface and conclusion, this article is total to divide into three parts, the main contents generalizes as follows:The preface mainly discusses the research object and research approach of this thesis.The first part of this article mainly discusses the concept of pure economic loss. This part includes: what is pure economic loss, the concept and categories, the character of pure economic loss, the comparison with the types of damage in civil law. That we will clarify the meaning and extension of the pure economy lose.The second part of this article mainly discusses theoretic development and cases of pure economic loss in British, American, German and France, and then compares and analyze these attitudes .Passed comparison research to carry on an entire content to that problem, to make analysis the reason of dissimilarity processing way. And put forward a suggestion about our country. We should adopt the way that the policy consideration and the research of typical.The third part of this article mainly about the research of typical. Pure economic loss has very abundance of categories, so we can not use one standard to solve all the types. So it needs looking for different ways for different categories after considering the policy factors behind each category. This article mainly analyzed five types: ricochet loss, loss of the public service facilities' close, transferred loss, product responsibility and loss of the professional information or the professional service. The conclusion is about the conclusion of topic and reason about this article. |
PDF Full Text Request