This thesis considers the structure and the related issues about the crime of holding a huge amount of property with unidentified sources. The writer thinks the essential characteristic of this crime is the combination of possession and nonfeasance. The conversions of the onus of proof and the presumption of guilt to some degree are the embodiment of lawmaking materialism. We can find the support in theory and the rationality in practice. By means of analyzing the legislation rules, judicial impersonal effect of judicatory and the need in practice, the writer with the help of overseas lawmaking experiences suggests changing the accusation, principal part, the detailed contents of legislation, the setup of criminal penalty, the former matched legislation and the execution to make the implement of this crime valid, scientific and make the judicial and social effect better and better. |