Evidence Reinforcing The Rules

Through a comprehensive analysis of the rules of corroboration and especially for reinforcing rules theoretical thinking, the paper attempted to have certain positive judicial practice. This paper is composed by five parts. Firstly, from the generation of rules of corroboration, on it from the different perspectives and comments, the meaning of the rules of corroboration, the type of system and the status and role in the rules of evidence, the author want to analysis the significance of the rules of corroboration. In the second part of paper, the author want to explain the basic theory, such as the rules of corroboration rationale, scope, extent and the admissibility and so on, revealing evidence obtained rules theoretical connotation while exploring for the following specific types of proceedings in the application of a theoretical foundation. Again is the criminal application of rules of corroboration, particularly the application of the rules accomplices confessions obtained, in this regard there are many domestic and foreign scholars dispute, and has its own reasons, the author would describe them in connection with judicial practice. Fourth, I would like to express my views on the rules of evidence applicable in civil and administrative proceedings, the need for and feasibility of the existence and application of specific cases. Finally, the authors build a number of bold vision on the entities and procedural rules of corroboration. My aim is to have some positive significance for the...