| Sanda accompanied by constantly improving the competitive level, the level of Sanshou theory has also been gradually deepened. Theoretical study focused on Sanda Sanda attack and tactical aspects of technology research, research on Sanda defense theory or a vacuum. Research stage on Sanda defense theory only defense is divided into contact and non-contact defense defense, has not been able to contact and non-contact defense defensive breakdown. This article will be classified Sanda defense technology and its applications for the study, Combined with literature data and2012National Wushu Sanshou Championship, quarterfinals, semifinals and finals of all levels will be68games live video Sanshou defense technology as a further classification. According to the defense has been recognized by contact and non-contact defense on the basis of sex, be subdivided into contact defense, emergency confrontational defense, defense and counterattack predictability predictability counter-defense. Emergency confrontational defense is the use of the arms and legs carried Block technical movements, including the anti-hanging, hanging files, cover the elbow, blocking; predictability counterattack while the defense is on the defensive counterattack, including TWINS and beat pressure; Predictability counter defense is directly engaged volley or counter-party action, including interdiction and outflank. The non-contact defense divided, compromise of defense and dodge Defence. Concession of defense is to defend by moving footwork, including withdrawal step and jump flash; Defence is to dodge by moving the body’s defense, including the flash, side flash, flash dive and knee.Defensive player of the competition in the use of technical analysis showed that: Although the use of technology is far more offensive to use defensive techniques, but the defense is much higher than the success rate of the use of offensive skills, defensive skills are the key to win the game. In defense technology usage and contact defensive success rates are higher than non-contact defense, defensive contact than non-contact defense using simple, non-contact defense counterattack after more threatening. Large, medium and small groups of three levels slightly above the level of large and small levels, no significant difference in the overall frequency of use in the defense of the use of technology in the level number is higher than the number of contact defensive use of non-contact defense.Contact defense, usage and success rates in the order of:emergency confrontational defense, defensive back predictability, predictability counter-defense. Emergency confrontational defense mainly linked to the use of file and block more; Predictability counterattack defense, TWINS shoot using higher pressure using pressure to shoot a high success rate in TWINS; predictability counter-defense, the use of copy hold much higher than interdiction, interdiction success rate is much higher than copied hold. Contact defense, the main use of the large level of emergency confrontational defense; Level of predictability in the use of more defensive back and a higher success rate, followed by emergency confrontational defense; Small level is the main use of the contingency confrontational defense, small level of exposure of the low success rate of the overall defense larger and medium levels.In the non-contact defense was no significant difference in the frequency of use of compromise between defense and dodge Defence, Defence dodge high success rate in the concession of the defense. Yield of defense, withdrawal step and success rate is much higher than using flash jump. Dodge of defense, after the flash, side flash and flash dive using mostly use less knee. Success rates in the order of dive flash after flash, flash side, knee. Large level of defense dodge the frequency of use and the success rate is higher than the yield of the defense; Mid-level and small level of use of concessions and more defensive success rate. n non-contact defense, the use of small level most times, intermediate other highest success rate. |