Font Size: a A A

Spivak, Kristeva's Feminist Criticism Comparative Study

Posted on:2009-10-22Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Y WangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2207360245460055Subject:Comparative Literature and World Literature
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Julia Kristeva (1941 -), is well-known contemporary French literary theorist and critic。She was born in Bulgaria, after the resettlement of France. Since the 1960s, she become a symbol of France's leading sports figures, in the post-structuralist,feminist, psychological analysis, deconstruction, and other fields have achieved。Gayatri C. Spivak(1942 -), is the famous American Indian women academics, criticized the position of its flexible, deconstruction, Marxism, feminism and post-colonial And are involved in their areas. Criticism of its uniqueness and impact in the academic community has increasingly come under people's attention.This paper by two scholars of feminist criticism of the carding and analysis, in comparison to the Perspective, from a deeper level, deepen their understanding of their feminist criticism of the theory of knowledge and understanding. In the text I Kristeva and Spivak, mainly from the two theories of the formation of cultural background, theoretical source of feminist thinking of the core concepts and feminist ideological perspective on the four areas, from which we can see that the two - Effective feminist scholars have come from the Third World despite the origin and identity of the national culture, and are subject to a good education and to accept the influence of western culture, but their criticism of feminist theory purport is different. Especially in the resistance, and even subvert the existing unreasonable patriarchal hegemony discourse, from different angles to their in-depth exploration and effective attempt, for our theoretical research to provide a new perspective on, and with great practical significance And theoretical value。...
Keywords/Search Tags:Feminism, white center, post-colonialism, marginalization, double discourse hegemony
PDF Full Text Request
Related items