Research On Evaluation Index System Of Economic Responsibility Audit Of University Leaders

Along with China’s economic reform and market economy, the gradual deepening of structural change, as non-profit administrative institutions, in universities, economic decision-making at all levels of leading cadres has been further strengthened. Meanwhile, the College has a more profound social influence, internal audit of its economic responsibility of leading cadres facing increasingly strict environmental oversight. As for the results of the audit, the audit is not only an impact on the leading cadres themselves, but also about the wise use of public property and appropriate exercise of public authority. Thus, this work not only for leading cadres itself seriously, but also makes the relevant departments and organizations pay special attention to. The scientific basis for effective Universities economic responsibility audit work lies in the index for the evaluation of leading cadres’ performance of duties and the measure is appropriate, which is also the important and difficult work. Leading cadres to conduct economic responsibility audit significance lies not only in its own style of leading cadres’ specification, also be used as cadre’s competition, selection and appointment of an objective basis. This evaluation index relevance, objectivity and effectiveness and put forward higher demands to establish an evaluation system to avoid the subjective factors that may bring all kinds of random results. An ideal evaluation index system and evaluation model, should be done on the basis of the scientific division of economic responsibility and authority on both to define its performance management, nor miss the work needs to be strengthened at the enabling regulation the best way, which is the problem of corruption prevention at source.This paper summarizes, research, application examples, etc., the first of the research question and the background and significance of the research are described, based on current research and related theories outlined on the analysis of existing internal Universities leaders audit evaluation, and points out where the problem lies. For defects in the original framework, the indicators have been refined and perfected to further build out an internal evaluation of universities economic responsibility audit. Study worthies standing on the shoulders of the reference economic responsibility audit and the audit institutions of higher learning advanced experience at home and abroad, the introduction of innovative thinking in terms of categories of indicators, with a view to a more systematic, to quantify the economic responsibility of leading cadres in the performance of duties carried out evaluation, selection and to provide for the appointment and removal of cadres strong basis, improve the supervision of cadres and self-control environment, to ensure that public property and take advantage of the terms of reference, and thus capable of auditing theory and practice circles contribute, but also for the social atmosphere and improvement of the environment play a positive role.