A Discussion On Judgment Of The Party Nature Of Kuomintang By The Communist International 1921-1927

From "Multilateral Classes Revolutionary Coalition", "National Revolutionary Party", "Worker-Farmer Union Party", "the People's Democratic Party", "Revolutionary Political Union" to "Fighting Revolutionary Union", the Soviet Russia and the Communist International give their judgment of the party nature of the Kuomintang. These judgments conceal bourgeoisie's character of the Kuomintang.The Communist International explained the party nature of the Kuomintang as "Multilateral Classes Revolutionary Coalition" before restructuring of the Kuomintang, and they lay stress on the Kuomintang is supported by the democratic bourgeoisie. It results that the Kuomintang's nature is put a higher evaluation and covered its bourgeoisie class attribute. After the Kuomintang completed their reorganization, the Communist International not only made their aims to develop the Kuomintang into a workers and peasants party, but also made a working process as an accomplished fact. Due to the epistemically warp in nature of Kuomintang, the Communist International discussed the nature of Wuhan National Government is a union made by workers, peasants and petty bourgeoisie. In a sudden employ of Chinese revolution, Stalin propound Chinese revolution multiple stages theory and the communist international try to lead Chinese revolution toward non-capitalism direction. So the dissolution of revolution union and the Kuomintang were regarded as the beginning of a higher stage by the multiple stages theoryThe effect to Russia formulate Chinese Policy as follow:first, Kuomintang is thought as a multilateral-classes revolutionary coalition, so it was looked as the organization of united front. On the premise of keeping on the united front, although the Communist International pointed out proletarian should took over the leader of united front, they reached compromise with bourgeoisie. Second, the Communist International overestimated Kuomintang but underestimated the Communist Party of China, so they neglected on support to the latter. Third, Because of the Chinese revolution stage theory and division Kuomintang mechanically, the communist international analyses Kuomintang and its leaders not in depth. Fourth, for the development of Kuomintang-communist cooperation, the Soviet Union made its Chinese policy based on to try to lead Chinese revolution toward non-capitalism, and the judgment of party nature of Kuomintang by the Soviet Union is a target which severed for national interest but a reason to formulate Chinese policy. So, the communist international and Soviet Union communist will keep on the united front of Kuomintang-communist cooperation as possible as they can.