On The Move Without Using The Qualitative Behavior

Norway and did not use national staff behavior is the use of his position, violating financial and economic management system, without permission from the original unit will be set aside public funds with intent to use, but He was not using it. Illegal activities can be divided into type, for-profit activities and other activities based three types.Currently, on the move without using the qualitative behavior, there are many disputes, including not a crime that the attempt that the said suspension, and accomplished that. The main reason for disputes in the following areas:legislation generality and vagueness, the pressure from the community level and the theoretical understanding of the different understanding of the same legal language is different.The reasons for disagreement, to act on the move and did not use accurate characterization, we need to clarify the theoretical issues, including:Norway should be convicted but not with behavior; misappropriated by a subjective element in the elements; elements for personal use is an objective factor. Norway in affirming the act constitutes a crime and did not use the premise to discuss their specific patterns of crime, but have not moved with the conduct did not constitute a crime, preparation, suspension, and criminal attempt to commit any crime that is only gradually. Also, Norway and did not use three types of behavior can only be convicted of other activities, the standard type of misappropriation of public funds to punishment.