A Reward Forensics Problems Research

Prove real situation in the case all facts is the evidence. Evidence is the main purpose of sure know the facts of the case of objective evidence. The evidence is demonstrated their claims and demands of the important basis. Evidence is a judge to hear the case the main basis. Evidence for the lawsuit activity of start-up, with the end it play an important role. Anyhow evidence is the lawsuit activity of foundation, leaving evidence; all legal activities will be too weak, like. However, evidence obtained faces many problems, the our country present evidence system, evidence rules comparison indigent, content extensive, and relevant evidence rules are referring to the three lawsuit statute books and other laws and judicial interpretation in, and not formed a relatively complete system of evidence. Therefore, "forensics difficulty" is our judicial practice a real problem and the witness testifies difficult problem is more serious. "Reward forensics" can to a certain extent increase witnesses the enthusiasm and initiative. A reward for proof litigation evidence refers to facts relevant personnel public commitment in the witness testifies or provide evidence premise, giving particular reward behavior. Lawful evidence must first have recoverable sex, evidence to have "recoverable sex," refers to a litigant or other related personnel to provide evidence of compliance with legal relevant provision, possess the qualifications prescribed by law, the judge can be implemented in judicial activities for judging the case facts, and make a final judgment basis. A reward forensics obtained evidence is consistent with the legal provisions, therefore it has the evidence qualification and can be used as a judge the facts of the case and make a final judgment basis. In judicial practice, reward forensics is also widely used in administration, criminal, civil etc various legal fields. As the administrative areas of "illegal", pat reward criminal field warrant, reward notices, civil application fields more widely. A reward in evidence collection, evidence busting escaped personnel, protect the lawful rights has played a lot of action. But because there a complete and perfect the legal system of reward forensics to regulate so in the judicial practice there exist many problems. To compensate for these loopholes and the insufficiency, the author suggests that our country should publish relevant laws and regulations, to reward forensics system necessary legal regulating. For the reward of the regulation measures the paper also evidence to ask some simple Suggestions, hoping for perfecting reward forensics system could help. This paper first chapter is a reward forensics paper mainly introduces the definition, and reward forensics reward forensics characteristics. And through the introduction of the definition, and evidence of evidence, and explains the importance of reward forensics behavior appears reasons. In this chapter, the second quarter analyzes the reward system produce realistic reason evidence. Mainly because evidence action is the decisive factors, and because of state law system is still not perfect, to witness the protection of the right of citizen does not reach the designated position, the legal consciousness compare weak and other reasons, makes it hard to achieve the relevant case evidence. This makes a reward forensics act as a comparison of the parties forensics effectively means. The second chapter through will reward of evidence and "buy witness", and "the trap forensics" two kinds of behavior comparison, further defined reward forensics system concept and characteristic. Meanwhile, refuted the reward forensics is synonymous with suborn the witness, and reward forensics is trap forensics two erroneous views. A reward of evidence and buy the witness although similarities, but two different concepts, cannot confuse STH with STH else. The third chapter through analyzing the theoretical basis of reward forensics, namely the reward of evidence effect problem, evidence demonstrates reward forensics legitimacy. Reward forensics obtained evidence corresponds to objectivity criterion, and the correlation standard and legitimacy standards, so that through a reward forensics way the evidence obtained have evidence qualification, and could be used as proof of the facts of the case evidence. In the second quarter analyses the realistic meaning, forensics reward further demonstrates the necessity of system existing forensics reward. Although a reward forensics system for evidence collection has an important meaning, but has some shortcomings and the insufficiency. This chapter of the third quarter is mainly to the reward forensics system regulation with the problems is proposed. Through effective legal regulation can compensate for lack of evidence reward behavior, give full play to its effectiveness. The fourth chapter through will foreign, the private detective system with Chinese reward forensics system present situation in our country, to analyze compare reward forensics system and advantage of deficiency, continue to carry forward our advantage, draw lessons from foreign experience make up this deficiency. This article final chapter is to reward forensics system in the judicial practice using a bit of advice. Hope by comparing strict legal procedures, avoid buy witnesses, and damage the witness the rights problem arises. We hope that this paper to reward forensics in judicial practice of perfect play a role.