The Effection Of Exercise Rehabilitation In Patients With Chronic Heart Failure (Coronary Heart Disease) On The Cardiac Function

Purpose: through the use of exercise rehabilitation therapy combined with drug therapy(coronary heart disease) and chronic heart failure (CHF), observed in patients with cardiacfunction and quality of life changes; to explore a safe and effective treatment for CHFexercise rehabilitation programme.Method:1selected,72patients were randomly divided into treatment group and controlgroup, the control group received drug treatment; treated by drug therapy combined withrehabilitation exercise program, for a period of3weeks, follow-up for half a year.2, observetwo groups of patients after3weeks and half a year later,1changes in the cardiac functionof2quality of life change.3, observe two groups of patients within half the rate ofrehospitalization and mortality (cardiovascular disease related death).Result:1,3weeks after the change of the indicators:1NYHA heart functionclassification total efficiency:83.3%in the treatment group, control group75%;2to six minutewalk test total efficiency:80.6%in the treatment group, control group72.3%;3cardiacultrasound contrast of index: P>0.05, no statistical difference significance; more than three areused to illustrate the changes of heart function in patients with. In4the Minnesota quality oflife score comparison: P<0.05, with significant difference, the treatment group was better thancontrol group.5Chinese medicine clinical symptom integral total efficiency:86.1%in thetreatment group, control group80.6%.6body weight, blood pressure and blood glucose incontrast: P<0.05, with significant differences, the treatment group was superior to controlgroup.2, half a year after the change of the indicators:1NYHA heart function classificationtotal efficiency:94%in the treatment group, control group79%;2to six minute walk test totalefficiency:90.9%in the treatment group, control group79.5%;3cardiac ultrasound contrast ofindex: P<0.05, with significant differences, treatment group than in the control group. In4theMinnesota quality of life score comparison: P<0.05, with significant difference, the treatmentgroup was better than control group; the treatment group within group comparisons showedthat P<0.05, follow-up for half a year when3weeks after the more obvious effect than.5clinical Chinese medicine syndrome: treatment group total effectiveness is93.9%, forcontrol group82.4%.6body weight, blood pressure and blood glucose in contrast: P<0.05, with significant differences, in treatment group than in control group; the treatment groupwithin group comparisons showed that P<0.05, follow-up for half a year when3weeks afterthe more obvious effect than.3, half a year before hospitalization rate and mortality,readmission rate:1: treatment group and control group in total of2passengers, a total of9person-time, statistically, P<0.05, the treatment group was superior to control groupin2mortality: the two groups were no death case.Conclusion:1, using drug therapy combined with rehabilitation exercise program cansignificantly improve CHF and cardiac function of patients with clinical symptoms, and withexercise rehabilitation time prolonged, the effect is more obvious.2, exercise rehabilitationprogram can improve the life quality of patients with CHF.3, exercise rehabilitation schemecan reduce the rate of hospitalization in patients with CHF.4, exercise rehabilitation schemecan effectively control the body weight, blood pressure and hyperglycemia, hypertension anddiabetes mellitus on patients with CHF plays a positive therapeutic effect.5, drug therapycombined with rehabilitation exercise program on (coronary heart disease) CHF treatmenteffective, economical and practical, easy to carry out, it deserves further research andpopularization.