Font Size: a A A

Progress In Stroke-related Risk Factors For Clinical Analysis

Posted on:2013-10-04Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:X J HuangFull Text:PDF
GTID:2234330374994912Subject:Neurology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
Objective:To investigate the clinical risk factors for progressive stroke. Methods:Aretrospective analysis of clinical data of68patients of the hospital and randomly selectednon-progressive ischemic stroke patients hospitalized in the same period70cases as as thecontrol group. The two groups of patients with admission systolic blood pressure,admission blood glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, history of hypertension, history ofdiabetes and neck vascular ultrasound analysis. Results:The progressive group comparedwith the control group:①The two sets of history of hypertension was no significantdifference②progressive group admission systolic blood pressure (154.18±22.7)mmhg,non-progressive group (150.8±20.0),between the two groups was no statisticallysignificance (P>0.05). The③progression group history of diabetes,44cases (65%) of21cases (30%), non-progressive group, the difference between the two groups wasstatistically significant (P <0.001). Progress in group admission blood glucose (11.3±3.5)mmol/l, glucose (7.6±1.6) mmol/l, difference between the two groups was statisticallysignificant (P <0.001) in the admission of non-progression group.(4) Progress Levels ofcholesterol (4.7±0.9) non-progressive group of cholesterol (4.8±1.0) mmol/l differencebetween the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05), the progression grouptriglycerides (1.8±0.7) mmol/l non-progressive group glycerol three ester (1.7±0.7)difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).⑤progressof carotid plaque detection for62detection rate of91.2%. Soft plaque number37, adetection rate of54.4%. Hard plaques for5. Detection rate of7.4%. Mixed plaquesdetected in20, the detection rate of29.4%. Detection of non-progression group was87.1%.The soft-stained block and seizure rates were8and11.4%; hard plaque detection is38, thedetection rate of54.3%, mixed plaques detected in15, the detection rate of21.4%. Thedifference was statistically significant (P <0.001). Conclusion:a history of diabetes, bloodsugar, progressive group of stroke and neck vascular ultrasound unstable plaque is theprogress in stroke risk factors, in line with research trends at home and abroad.
Keywords/Search Tags:Stroke in Progression, Analysis of risk factors, Neck atherosclerotic plaque
PDF Full Text Request
Related items