Autistic Children And Normal Children Parents Psychological Theory Comparative Study

Objective Autistic children as a special social group, due to impaired socialinteraction so that it can not be well with the surrounding human interaction, as autismthe etiology is not clear. There is evidence from genetics of autism have geneticpossibilities, has a large number of studies show that children with autism inpsychological theory ability existence obstacle, then the parents of autistic childrenpsychological theory ability and normal person also has the difference, is unclear. Theforeign research has made the preliminary discussion, there is still lack of research ondomestic. This study attempted to verify: parents of autistic children and normalchildren ’ theory of mind are different, and then tries to find from neurocognitiveaspects of autistic children deficiency in theory of mind the existence of geneticsfactors of indirect evidence.Methods The experimental group subjects:32from Hefei City Spring Bud disabledmutual association behavior training of autistic children ’s parents. Their ages rangefrom25to43years, in which the male8, female24. The control group were tested:32from the same area, the physical examination, examination of the nervous system,mental state examination found no somatic diseases, diseases of the nervous systemand retardation of normal children ’s parents. Their ages range from25to41years ofage, the male12, female20. Experimental methods: background test fromHUK-AHMU neuropsychological scale of digit span test, digit span along the backback test and line direction judgment test. Psychological test theory for computer program version of the" Yoni" test (Chinese edition). The test can reflect the subjectin psychological theory and psychological theory of cold heat capacity in the cold,including First Order Cognitive Theory of Mind、Second Order Cognitive Theory ofMind、First Order Affective Theory of Mind、Second Order Affective Theory ofMind.Results Background: the test of experimental group and control group had nodifference between statistical significance, including age (t=0.26, P=0.80), gender(2=1.16, P=0.281), education (t=0.98, P=0.86), MMSE (t=-0.40, P=0.69),digital span along the dorsal (t=-0.46, P=0.65), digit span back (t=-0.72, P=0.48), direction judgment (t=0.40, P=0.69). Theory of mind quiz: the experimentalgroup and the control group the cold psychological theory scores between thedifference was not statistically significant (t=0.10, P=0.92). The experimentalgroup and control group in the thermal theory of mind score differences between thestatistical significance (23.06+5.12,25.63+4.47; P=0.004). The experimental groupand the control group of complex emotional score differences between there arestatistically significant (10.13+4.14,14.87+2.21; P=0.04).Conclusion The experimental group and the control group between the thermaltheory of mind ability scores the difference was statistically significant, andperformance for the experimental group was lower than that of control group. Theexperimental group and the control group between the complex emotion ability scoredifferences are statistically significant, and performance for the experimental groupwas lower than that of control group. That parents of autistic children thermal theoryof mind and complicated emotion ability difference from normal children with parents.The autistic children’s theory of mind ability deficiency may exist in the geneticfactors provides neurocognitive aspects of indirect evidence.