Compare Existential Sentences Between Chinese And Korean Instructional Design

The description for "have/has" is one of the fundamental usages of all human languages. A large number of Korean junior learners are prone to use the structure of "have/has" grammar frequently when they firstly start learning Chinese. While Chinese has a different language structure on expressing "have/has". However, it only has very few predicates in the grammar on expressing "have/has" in Korean, which also has a much more free order, so it would not cause a switch on the structure even its ord-er is changed. Thus, Koreans usually make the mistakes on the loss or conf-usion of predicates when the structure of "have/has" is used in learning Ch-inese. This paper is aimed to make a brief summary and comparison on the structure of "have/has" both in Korean and Chinese in hope of offering a reference for junior Chinese learners and junior Chinese teaching teachers in Korea.This paper is going to be divided into5chapters, with the following contents:Chapter1:A brief introduction on subjects, background, methodology and language resource of this paper.Chapter2:A comparison on "是""有""Verb+着""在" usage.Chapter3:A brief research on the usage of "have/has" based on Kor ean middle school students’learning situation and teaching solution.Chapter4:The teaching plan on the usage of "have/has" to Korean m iddle students.Chapter5:A summary on the contributions and some points that need to be improved.