| In this paper, we use a method of comparison to Maya hieroglyphs and oraclebone,analyses the differences and similarities on phonetic and participation fromstatic and dynamic,."the same" as the basic starting point, from the same comparisonto explore "differences", and this different reason.There are four chapters in this article:The first part is a description of the Maya, and give a general introduction to theMayan civilization, the Maya language, Maya text, and the domestic and foreignresearch status of the Maya text.The second part is about the phonetic comparison between Maya and oracle boneon a static level. on the Maya word,we base on the dictionary《Dictionary of MayaHieroglphs》 written by John Montgomery, analyze all of the words composed byphonetic and phonetic themselves from a static level. And we can see that Maya singlephonetic form are concrete, and numerous variants,each variant shares the commonmeaning. Some of them also has the identity ideographic, but the more phonetic onlyphonetic features.we start the analyses of Oracle’s phonetic,from the researchmaterials of Oracle phonogram words and the words based on the rule of rubus inrecent years. From the physical point of view, Freehand, fewer variants, at the sametime can not replace each other, the body and the meaning are closely linked.from aphonetic point of view, the body on behalf of many syllable,and all of them arediscrete, but have a strong dependence on the meaning,the body can Indicate theOrigin. phonetic and ideographic are included in the words,and are equally importantbut different from the phonetic hierarchy.The second part is about the phonetic comparison on the participation betweenMaya and oracle bone on a static level. From the source of, the phonetic of thecombination are usually from the homonym replacement and derived from theideographic these two areas, and found that the combination of phonetic prompt soundaccurate, the structure of phonetic+ideograph are lower Productive.with a linearcombination of the phonetic+phonetic. After the phonetic independent from theMayan hieroglyphs,they show the trend of excessive from initial discretedependent to the attachment,and show a strong dependence of the structure andcomposition.Through the analysis of static and dynamic character of Maya phoneticand their participation, Maya phonetic have a strong dependence. phonetic andideographic function has been separated and the clear division of labor. Compared toMaya phonetic which have the dependent features, Oracle’s phonetic is moreself-sufficient. In the words that complicated by the phonetic, the Oracle phoneticare involved in word in a way of holistic metonymy, a large number of soundsymbols, but use singled in the phonogram. phonetic accuracy is not high, and havethe dual role of voice prompts and significance in the participation No matter whatkind of coinage way, the purpose of the phonetic which participate in the word isdifference itself with othersThe fourth chapter is drawn after the phonetic contrast between Mayahieroglyphs and the oracle bone in first two chapters, and then investigate the causesof this difference,dig the reason. after the research we found that the phonetic of thistwo language show the difference in the figurative and abstract of the body, thephonetic origin and hierarchical, and rubus principles and the the homophonic theprinciple this three aspects,and try to find the reason for this difference, which mainly in three aspects, external reason is that a different in the cultural memory result in thedifference of the path of development. The different effects of the development of thetext of the text vectors.The internal reason is mainly the binary complementary anddiversified portfolio which formed in the process of word development.The last part is the conclusion, according to Oracle and Maya phonetic analysisand we found that the functional of the phonetic and semantic symbols separation ornot is the key to use phonetic to improve the self-system. |
PDF Full Text Request