The Difference And Cooperation Of The England And French Appeasement Strategic Before World War Ⅱ

After the first World War,because of the war brought enormous destructive power,makes theAnglo-French peace at home, emotional outbursts at the height of.A post-war Britain and Francehas embarked on the road of diplomatic appeasement, but due to the interests of the two countriesis different, different diplomatic idea, both sides in a series of problems have launched a fiercecompetition.British pacification policy implemented the traditional remained continent balance ofpower diplomacy.To maintain the continental balance of power, and to avoid too much involved incontinental Europe to avoid disputes, with their only indirect benefits for the state to providesecurity guarantees.But the French in Europe to dispute the maelstrom, geographical conditionscaused France to keep out of the affair in the European conflict; in order to maintain many yearsworked hard to establish the country and Europe of the alliance between England, need more exactand steady alliance assurance, apparently related to British strategic starting point is notconsistent.But when the face of the German and Italian fascists rise, always rely on the League ofnations increasingly weak and has been on the verge of collapse, their painstakingly build eastalliance system collapsed and domestic political and economic situation is very chaotic, theFrench government only in the argument and hesitation in several times to reduce their bottomline in order to maintain with the British alliance.Appeasement, was a British suppression frenchmethod of balance of power policy on the part of. But when the international situation due to asudden change in the situation, the British and French governments for the wrong estimate of thesituation and the leaders of the decision, a policy of appeasement become cowardly surrender andshameless betrayal of synonyms. Britain and France are now only tied together will it be possibleto minimize the threat of war.The text is divided into two chapters.The first chapter tries to discuss of flower law twocountries in the implementation of the policy of appeasement of the differences andcontradictions.This chapter from Germany ’s rise to ef EF treatment impact, Italy seek hegemonyattitude, EF in the ideological bias against appeasement policy influence on several aspects suchas Britain and France in the implementation of the policy of appeasement of the differences aretraceability analysis.The second chapter focuses on England and France in the implementation ofthe policy of appeasement in the process of compromise and cooperation.First discusses theAnglo-French from traditional diplomacy to appeasement policy change process; and then analyzes the EF contradiction is easing and gradually establish appeasement strategy process; thefinal analysis of flower law two countries to appeasement policy as the core of the diplomaticstrategy.