The Compairson And Study Of Records Of The Historian,GaoZu Biography’and ’Chronicls Of Han Dynasty,Gao King Biography’

Shiji and Han-shu are two important histories, each one of which has its special merits,and both of which have prominent position in historiography. Political milieu is different,Social milieu is different, It is different that the styles of history research of Sima Qian andBangu. Since the two histories were written, it have been significantly studied by historiansand scholars that the researches on the differences and similarities between Sima Qian andBangu. Most historians and scholars, basing on the entirety of the two histories, put emphasison textual criticism of the differences and similarities between Sima Qian and Bangu,andexplore for the studies of history research or the changes which include society and politicsand so on, but many works and researches which have been accomplished are short ofpertinence of the differences and similarities between Sima Qian and Bangu.The author of this paper selected Gaozu Benji of Shiji and Gaodiji of Han-shu to docontrasting studies in the fifty-five overlapping titles, and utilized the highly effectivecomputer-assisted text to compare with them word by word and to substantially demonstratethe differences and similarities between Sima Qian and Bangu.The author, tracking back to the origin of works which had been modified by Bangufrom Shiji, are in order to comprehensively look for the historiography value of thedifferences and similarities between Sima Qian and Bangu and to comprehend the differentidea of history research between Sima Qian and Bangu.Clou of this paper is to distinguish differences of how to overall differentiate and analysethe abbreviation of words and how to use words and phrases to verify the differences andsimilarities between Sima Qian and Bangu between Gaodiji of Han-shu and Gaozu Benji ofShiji which had been altered by Bangu.This paper clings the text of Gaozu Benji and Gaodiji which were contrasted by computerwith pattern of appendix in the last. It is in order to be conveniently and clearly read, thepaper also lists involved words in the main.Bangu altered Gaozu Benji in many ways, including changing adding and deleting. Theauthor of this paper focus on it,too. The author differentiates the merits and shortcomingswhich words had been changed by Bangu, and looks for the origin of which new information have been added into Gaodiji, and whither finds out what has been deleted in GaozuBenji.This paper compares Gaozu Benji with Gaodiji to discover the merits and theshortcomings of theirs.According to the modified category, this paper divided into five parts.The first, this paper amends the mistakes of historical records.The second, this paper appends exact time to historical events.The third, this paper modulates confused situation of historical events records.The fourth, this paper adds important imperial edicts.The fifth, this paper displaces words of similar meaning.Sima Qian and Bangu both have merits and shortcomings in themselves histories.Generally speaking, Sima Qian has more merits than Bangu in history research, but Banguhas also himself advantage.Basing on the studies of the former historians and scholars, theauthor of this paper would discover the unfound historical records and replenish theincomplete historical records, to do the beneficial historical researches of the differences andsimilarities between Sima Qian and Bangu.