Font Size: a A A

The Detection、Process And Development Of Simple-visual Feature Figure Feature Bindings

Posted on:2014-01-25Degree:MasterType:Thesis
Country:ChinaCandidate:Q ChenFull Text:PDF
GTID:2235330398955639Subject:Development and educational psychology
Abstract/Summary:PDF Full Text Request
In this research, there is a scheme to improve the change-detect paradigmexperiment reliability. It is important to use color-texture feature binding figures asexperiment materials to research the simple suprathreshold figures storage in theperceptual program. The perceptual development rule is researched by contrasting theconsequences between the20-years group and the25-years group.This research is consists of four parts.In the first part, We find that there are short of researches of experiment designand storage in the perceptually processes of feature bindings and developments ofperceptually process ability.In the second part, experiment one, we test the influence of different types ofstimulate test. These tests include same-category tests and dissame-category tests.In the third part, experiment two, we test the influence of locations and show-testtime. In this experiment, to test the storage of different dimension informations, weask the participants to judge by the condition which is showed in the detect test stage.In the fourth part, we discuss these experiments by the information which we getin the experiment one and two.The conclusions are these:1. The detection type and judgment conditions influence the conclusionsimportantly. Using secondary test method to restrain the influences of phonologicalloop is not essential.2. When multiple simple-visual feature figures are processed, the location of thefigure is the clue. There is sub-system preference when one figure is processed.3. The conclusion of the feature bindings process speed of20-years group isbetter than25-years group.4. When the condition complexity of judging feature binding changes, it don’tinfluence the conclusion of20-years group, but influence the25-years group. Whenthe condition complexity is simple, the conclusion of25-years group is better than20-years group. When the condition complexity is complex, the conclusion of20-years group is better than25-years group.
Keywords/Search Tags:feature binding, perceptually process, figure, development
PDF Full Text Request
Related items