Research On Judicial Application Of Taking Bribes Accomplice

According to investigations, in 81%-91% bribery cases besides the prime culprit there are other people who attended in committing the crime. In 2007 the issued supreme court & national supreme issued several suggestions about《With criminal cases of corruption on some issues of applicable law》. It has become undoubted that non-state personae can constitute joint offences in bribery cases. But in practice it is still difficult to identify Taking bribes accomplice. In this thesis the author has mainly probed into the following aspects:The developing of our country’s legislation on bribery, The constitutive elements of Taking bribes accomplice, The difference between Taking bribes accomplice and crime of introducing a bribe, The author also has done relevant research in legislation style of Taking bribes accomplice our country’s, Our country’s legislation on Taking bribes accomplice is becoming more & more standardized, The state personnel must have interest common interests with third party. And some of them must share the belongings used during bribery. Committing a crime of bribery includes accepting bribery, helping or asking others to offer a bribe. The fundamental difference between crime of introducing a bribe and bribery is whether they share the belongings or not. Influential bribery crime could be convicted only when the possibility of Taking bribes accomplice is excluded. The third party can constitute Taking bribes accomplice together with state personnel and the also can become principal criminal of Common bribery crime.