| Case registration is a necessary legal procedure in criminal litigation. Thenumber of the case in files reflects the barometer of the criminal offence situation in acertain area and during a certain period. Proper exercise of registration is helpful toexposing and punishing crimes correctly and promptly. Besides, it can protect thecitizen’s legal right from the invasion. At the same time, it provides an important basisfor the accurate evaluation and correct decision-making of the social crime situation.Proper exercise of registration is directly related to the correct analysis, assessmentand decision of the public security situation made by government departmentsconcerned. Therefore, it demands that criminal registration should be objective andtrue. In recent years, governments at all levels have elaborated more on the evaluationindexes of public security organs’ comprehensive management of public security.However, when coping with the great pressure caused by frequent occurrences ofcriminal and security cases, some local public security organs only take intoconsideration their positions in the evaluation rank and their political achievements.The organs continue pursuing the low rate of exposed cases and high rate of solvedcriminal cases. Consequently, they adopt the attitude of “no solving no registering”“case solving before case filling”. There even occur such abnormal phenomena as“they do not register the criminal case”,“they do not investigate the case even after itwas registered”, and “they do not affix the responsibilities of people involved evenafter the case was put on record”. The Ministry of Public Security has organizedpeople to look into the unreal statistic data of the cases placed on file, but little effecthas been produced. Therefore, there is still a long way to go for the proper exercise ofcase registration in the practical work. In order to further standardize the work of thepublic security organ, in July,2010, the Supreme People’s Procuratorate and theMinistry of Public Security jointly worked out and distributed “Rules on theSupervision of Registering Criminal Cases (for Trial Implementation)”. In addition, inJanuary,2011, the Beijing Public Security Bureau carried out the activity with“Publicity of Case Registration” as its theme. For two year, with the joint efforts ofdifferent departments, the situation of case registration has turned better. Due to theauthor’s work, she has got the chance to experience the transformation process of“Truthful Case Registration”. One year ago, the author began to pay attention to thetransformation, and collected a large amount of theoretical information on “TruthfulCase Registration”. Besides, she listened to field policemen’s advice and views on accepting and registering cases truthfully. Thus, she has accumulated a wealth ofmaterials. Making use of the her own working experience and the opportunity to writethe Master thesis and referring to the work of Beijing Public Security Bureau onstandardizing law enforcement, the author analyzes and surveys the current situationof case registration, attempting to see through the appearance to perceive the essenceand to find the causes for unreal case registration. On this basis, from the perspectiveof carrying out vocational training, standardizing law enforcement, developing thePublic Security informationization, strengthening the internal and external supervision,and putting into practice various regulations, the author analyzes and concludes theway of establishing and completing long-effective mechanism to properly exercise ofthe rights of case registration,... |
PDF Full Text Request