Comparison Of Chinese And Japanese Anti-monopoly Law

It is quite important for the competition mechanism to move well in the market economic system. Once there is something wrong with it, the economic development of the whole country will suffer a defeat. Anti-monopoly Law is the basic one that will maintain the market economic order and freedom. Therefore, it is so irreplaceable that we call it "economic constitution" or "the sill of modern business enterprise system". So it is necessary for us to perfect the anti-monopoly law in China. In this thesis, both the history of anti-trust law in China and that of Japan will be introduced firstly. Then look at the difference and similarity between them by the approach of comparison. Finally some suggestions will be given according to the factual situation in China after analyzing the successful experience of anti-monopoly in Japan.This study consists of five chapters as follows, Chapter one presents a general introduction about the histories of anti-monopoly law in both China and Japan from the macro perspective. It has been over60years since anti-monopoly law was drawn up in Japan. But in China, anti-monopoly just has a history for3years. Because of lack of experience, there are a lot of shortcomings in law-making and implementing. Under the background of economic integration in world, it is urgent for us to perfect the anti-monopoly law for the economic development. The successful experience of Japan will be valuable references for us.Chapter two compares the objects of anti-monopoly law between two countries in the micro viewpoint. The lessons and experience of Japanese anti-monopoly law will be discussed.Chapter three analyzes the problems in anti-monopoly law in China: organization redundancy, power cross, independence lack, etc.Chapter four mentions punishment in anti-monopoly law in China and Japan. Meanwhile, it is found that this problem is rather obvious in China.Chapter five is the conclusion. This part is concerned with a summary of the major work of this study. It is potential that to carry out some improvement from the aspects of the establishment of enforcement organizations, its hearing procedure, Judicatory relief system, etc.