On The Improvement Of The People’s Jury System In Civil

The jury system is the national judicial absorption of non-professional judges to participate in the civil, criminal trial of the case system. The jury system has a long history from its origins to now, and it also be used by all over the word now including China. It is called different in Commen law and Civil law, however, it is the national democratic a reflection of the judicial power and plays a supervisory role in some parts. The jury system is called People’s jury system, it comes from the Civil law and has our country’s characteristic. It has changed according to ours political, economic, cultural, so is called People’s jury system.This paper mainly discusses the Civil Jury System in China, in the first part of the article, it mainly introduces the meaning and value of the civil jury system, lists the meaning, origining and contents of the two legal systems on the jury system, then further information on the Civil Jury System value is below some of the theoretical content of bedding. The second part describes the Two Civil Jury System and the significance in China, introduces the representative in the common law countries, the United Kingdom and the United States Civil Jury System, and in civil law countries, France and Germany, and which China refers to. The third part discusses the people of our country’s jury system. Firstly, it discusses the legislative status quo of the Chinese people’s jury system, and the status of judicial practice, through the problems of our people, the jury system in the application of civil disputes. The existence of the jury system is not clear the scope of application, the qualifications of the jurors of the people is not clear, formal elective conditions and elective procedures, the people’s jury in the proceedings the rights, obligations and responsibilities are not clear. The existence of these problems is the people’s jury system, however, to achieve the purpose to be achieved by the beginning of its institutional setting. Justice without the assessment, the ratings do not debate still exists in some places even according to the preferences of the judge’s jury selection, even the abuse of judicial power among the masses caused considerable bad impact. The last part of the paper, it firstly discusses China’s theoretical circles on the Abolition of the civil jury system, the abolition of said reservation as to improve the perfect said. Then discusses China’s current national social conditions, the existence of the civil jury system is necessary, evently according to the third part of the problems in the judicial practice solve these problems.