Good Person To Apply For Administrative Reconsideration

Administrative reconsideration of the scope of the case to be discussed and the printing proposed to amend the numerous questions.In this article, I have no intention to talk about the old questions, while the intent of the inventive, the law on administrative reconsideration by the provisions of the scope of the case in actual cases, to make their own interpretation. Legal thinking were not to report the matter against the named informants apply for administrative reconsideration cases, the basis of positive law, the text is divided into five parts.The article begins with "Introduction", will focus on the two similar administrative reconsideration cases, leads after the case actually happened in real life to "legal doubts", that is, the issues to be discussed in this article, that is related to rights and the determination of the legal nature of the relationship, the administrative act and the definition of the specific administrative act, reported receiving authority’s statutory duties determined as well as the legitimate rights and interests are infringed identified. Next, the author of "public interest whistleblower apply for administrative reconsideration of the scope of accepting cases Laws. It can be said, which is a central element of the entire article. In this chapter, the author first of the "Report" and the meaning of the "public interest whistleblower clear, detailed exposition maximize control the direction of the writing of the article. Secondly, the positive law on the specific provisions of the the administrative reconsideration applicants qualified legal doubts "in four further integration:legal relations, administrative omissions, administrative acts constituting the elements of the problem as well as violations of legitimate equity issues, And each of the above problems are discussed in combination with the case put forward their point of view. The article finally, Author of "rule of law revelation that" a comprehensive solution to public service whistleblower apply for administrative reconsideration recommendations ending.Looking more, I think, an administrative legal relationship between citizens as a public informer to reported receiving organs (such as industry and commerce, taxation, etc.), real name reported on the formation of such a legal relationship adjustment by the Administrative Law. Reported receiving organs bear the obligation to reply in accordance with the law and the public interest informants have the legal right to reply, but this right is only a procedural right, rather than the rights of the entity. Reported receiving the contents of the reply of the authority is to exercise the right to dispose of the administrative, public service informants have no right to challenge this.