The Twenty-sixth Basketball Championship Of Chinese And Foreign Men’s Basketball Team Guard On Offense And Defense Ability Of The Comparative Study

With the development of modern basketball athletics level rising, the offensive and defensivetechniques and tactics system is perfected, school style and tactics of attack and also tends to be diversified.Because, each player’s consciousness and ability is not a, then, a team’s overall offensive and defensiveefficiency also naturally show some differences. How to use their strengths to the short is implementationteam tactics and offensive and defensive rhythm is the basis and premise, while the defender as a controland control the competition rhythm is the soul and core, guard level often directly determines the outcomeof the game. On26basketball championship, the Chinese men’s basketball team in the9war victory recordto win the championship, to establish our country team in the Asian dominance. However, the defenders inthe attack and defense consciousness and ability and foreign teams compared must also have their ownadvantages and disadvantages. Therefore, through literature, expert interviews, video observation,mathematical statistics, logical analysis and comparison on Chinese and foreign men s Basketball Guardsfor the offensive and defensive techniques and tactics ability indices were statistically, in order to obtainquantitative, qualitative results, to guide the Chinese men’s basketball team training and competition tobenefit somewhat. The main results are as follows:(1) Foreign players height, weight and significant differences exist, the Chinese team has clearadvantage, foreign players older than high, reflecting the stadium experience more rich, however, physicalaspects are at a disadvantage. Quetelet index and the Laurel index contrast found Chinese guard’s body,width, thickness and tissue density is better, and muscle, skeletal, splanchnic and adipose tissue state notagainst team defender. (2) Chinese defenders in scoring79.1, significantly higher than against the team, but the Chinesedefenders to score lower than against team team contribution. Three mark of ball and two ball shots is notagainst Backfields’ shots, scoring efficiency has significantly better than the opponent.(3) The lack of consciousness of Chinese guards attack, individuals scoring ability is better than theopposing team, shooting technique application lacks, attack efficiency than other Asian countries, but theball after the attack awareness is not high, which mates with a shield and cooperate consciousness is strong,can provide with companions to create more shots.(4) Chinese defenders from the free-throw line, averaging error was significantly better than theopponent, averaged assists and scoring, assists the fastbreak and fast break points higher efficiency;Chinese defenders in offensive rebounds in terms of the number of strong in the match, Chinese teamdefender and defensive rebounds against the guards at a distinct disadvantage compared to the number of.From the total number of successful breakthrough, and the number of breakthrough success ratecomparison situation, Chinese guards breakthrough dribbling technique is better than against the team,however, the breakthrough consciousness is relatively poor.(5) The field foul times China team and against team defender fouls without obvious difference; thefield foul times stronger than the opponent, but steals ability; to help defend the filling-in success ratebesides higher than the United Arab Emirates and outside Bahrain, the indexes are equal or lower than theopposing team; Chinese defender mainly adopts a defensive way, stick force less than defense againstteams.