The Study On Forwards’ Offensive Capability Of The Final Eight Men’s Basketball Team In Sixteenth Asian Games

The16th Guangzhou Asian Games men’s basketball game is over, Confront with home court advantage, although the Chinese men’s basketball team arrives won the last of the champions, but winning the competition with breathtaking and hardship within every people remember. Because China lost Yao Ming and Yi Jian Lian inside, China reduced inside strength greatly, the ability of comprehensive attack also reduced greatly too, this is a test for younger generation of Chinese basketball player. The Asian games, China hired a new famous American coach named Deng Hua DE, new coach inject the brand-new concept of attack to our team, China’s overall strength had picked up greatly, but other Asian strong teams had is quite large of development also, like Iran, South Korea, and Qatar, as the team’s strength has a larger degree of improvement. Today’s Asia basketball has already formed the league and the situation, South Korean men’s basketball team and the rise of Asia team of China men’s basketball team Asian supremacy caused serious threat, in2009China men’s basketball team is the best example to explain the defeat in Tian Jin.This through the sixteenth session of the asian games china men’s basketball team forwards and the other final eight forwards on the offensive capacity of the relevant indicators for comparison and analysis, which concluded that, for the Chinese team after training and competition to provide reference.(1) The height and weight which Chinese team forwards’had are slightly better than any other teams, but also occupy certain advantages, such as Zhu Fang Yu, Ding Jin Hui are in when the play is in the best period of competitive state, full use of the their superior technology and a rich gaming experience, as the team’s main strength, only the age of Zhou is too young. but doing well, relatively large room for improvement.(2) Chinese forwards in the3points investment than other teams in game, there was a significant difference. Chinese forwards’scored in the game means players and score slightly means a single, long shot is the main way to score3points; the forwards’with the other Asian teams scoring methods used are mainly from3-point shot and cast the ball2combined score means rich, though not very high hit rate, but their offensive tactics are correct.(3) China’s fast-break team forwards’tactical awareness is not strong.(4) The ability of Chinese forwards’breakthrough significantly less than the other, it is an indisputable fact, the Chinese forwards’for the implementation of the "cast, suddenly, into" the basic technology is relatively poor. And breakthrough mobility action is not good, should be strengthened, after break, and break the ball after the break as well as the ability to jump.(5) The Chinese team forwards’failure rate was significantly lower than the participating teams forward, pass the ball, especially in the outstanding performance; same height as full use of the advantages of active defense, causing the other errors to increase.