| Swiss Federer since February 2,2004 reached the world’ s first men’s professional tennis "throne" has been with his impressive record of writing a tennis legend,he has no one to shake the tennis dominant position.Spain’ s Nadal is the only one juvenile can stop Federer got the "whole grand slam" of people,people of these two warring people as Borg and Mcenroe,Agassi and Sampras peak between games the eyes of the world are focused on the two men.Through literature,expert interviews,video of statistics law, statistics,analysis and comparison of research methods and Nadal vs. Federer serving at the stage,then serve stage stalemate stage technical and tactical use of comparative analysis of the characteristics drew the following conclusions:(1) Federer’s first serve placement and rotation than the combination of Nadal volatile and more concealed,especially in the grass court,the volume of Ace and the 1st serve points won%were significantly higher than Nadal.Federer’ s serve is superior to the overall capacity Nadal.(2) 1ederer seek the best balance point between the 2nd serve’ s attacks and stability,the 1st serve points won%higher than Nadal.(3) With high-quality serve,Federer has a strong sense of the approach net in the third shooting attack,the convergence capacity is superior to Nadal.(4) Federer on the return more than Nadal changes,but relatively weak awareness of the attack.Relying on high-quality service to Nadal often playoffs stalemate stage.On the return points won%,the gap between the two men is little. (5) In stalemate stage,the stability of the technical Nadal smaller fluctuations Federer backhand technology volatile,but the two technologies are to maintain the stability of the higher level of the two men were hit,placement,line,the depth of performance are superior choice.(6) In stalemate stage,Federer cut combination of active variable in the ability of Nadal,Nadal uses abundant physical and running fast and flexible use of frequent attacks being Federer backhand in the stalemate in the occupied advantage. |