| From now most people work with computer that large part of officers will spend3or4hours with computers when they do their job, it will cost more than this time. As we know that if human keep this posture for a long time, it will make some parts of muscles fatigued and spasm, when this condition keep a long time, it can make some joint, muscles and ossature changed from physiology. The position unbalance illness in office will be happened. The name is Upper Cross Syndrome. The terrible Upper Cross Syndrome can make up body to deformity style that patient can’t see something in front of themselves, not only take the pain form the psychology, but also make them physical disability in their whole life. Although it can impact household life from different places. Even though Upper Cross Syndrome often make thorax deformity, diaphragmatic activity limitation, visceral have compression and tharacic and abdominal paste, it will affect breath, circulate and digese function, it will make any illness from breath and digest, the important is if suddendly acute abdomen happened,it’s hard to find one righrt way to have surgery. Also the main part of Upper Cross Syndrome at the legs the frontso orthocenter not steady is easy to trip and make many harm, in especial is it can make canalis spinalis stenosis and the paralysis usually hanppend.In this paper, using the test research questionnaire, incentives on cross syndrome and its correction methods to do the research and analysis. To investigate the influence of bad posture of patients posture state, and through the manipulation, PNF tensile, resistance training effects on cross body rehabilitation patients.Methods:subjects were recruited108people,54of them cross syndrome patients (group F), healthy control group (H group), F group5, for a period of12weeks,3times a week PNF skill trainingThe content includes:the object of study (group F), B, C divided into three experimental groups. The tensile and relaxation of the A experimental group were too tight trapezius and pectoralis major, pectoralis minor muscle; B of experimental group patients than in pine trapezius beam and deep deep neck flexors of resistance training on patients with tight; trapezius beam, pectoralis major, pectoralis minor muscle stretching and relaxation and loose trapezius beam and deep deep neck flexors of resistance training and implementation of the C experimental group,3times a week, every part of every time in3groups of8. With three months as a period of the experiment, the experimental results of implementing measurement comparison. H group without any intervention posture position applied before and after the training evaluation instrument for3groups of F group posture assessment test, H group only in the experimental test time.Results:(1) Before training group F posture position evaluation index compared with H group, there was significant difference (P<0.01).(2) In group F, A, B training, C group index in posture position evaluation index does not exist significant differences.(3) F group C group posture position evaluation very significant differences exist in the12week after training (P<0.01) optimization model.(4)In group F, group A B posture position evaluation index in the12weeks before and after training there exists difference (P<0.05)(5)12weeks after training in F group optimization model of C group posture position evaluation index compared with the H group there was no significant difference (P>0.05).The experimentation show that for patients with tight trapezius beam, pectoralis major, pectoralis minor muscle is stretched and relaxed and loose trapezius, rhomboideus beam and deep cervical flexor resistance training can effectively improve the syndrome test cross. |
PDF Full Text Request