Comparison Of Marx’s And Hagel’s Conception Of History

In the modern society, there is full of the material desire and desolation of spirit.The problem of human existence is increasingly prominent. The compulsory logic ofcapital constrains development and progress of mankind, and antinomy as ImmanuelKant goes appears in the communication among people. Of course, the antinomy is notthe actual content of Kant’s knowledge system. The moral decline and significance dropcompel us to revise the human existence, truth and life. The rationality and theperceptual seclusion force today’s people to feel overloaded. Person is viewed as amethod, so Mettrie who is famous enlightenment thinker of France said:“Man ismachine” and Marx stated and explained this point too. Alienation of labor, currency,capital, ideology and other aspects show that human beings should return to emotionand care about human existence, focus on reality and life, because that’s foundation andmaterial of human existence. The formation of Marx’s ideological system is to criticizeand accede Hegel, Feuerbach. Especially, the form of Marx’s historical materialism isbased on the Hegel’s ideological system. In terms of essence, materialistic dialectics ishistorical dialectics, so we should view and understand human existence, human natureand human importance form historical angle: the occurrence of history, regularity ofhistory, power of history and expectation of history!...