| To steal property behavior fraudulently produced a class of fraud as theeconomic and social development as a means to theft for the ultimate purpose ofthe criminal acts, this crime because it contains both fraud and theft of two acts,cause whether theorists or practitioners larger controversy for judicialdetermination of the type of crime. Mainly in theoretical circles, steal propertyfraudulently behavior identified three different views, respectively, fraud, theftand Implicated.Starting to fraudulently steal property from a typical case analysis researchfraudulently steal property this complex crime, evaluation of the publicprosecution and judicial organs for the case of different identified and given forsuch cases justice finds a little thinking.This article is a case of paper, the author mainly divided into three sectionselaborate. The first part of the case, including the introduction of the basic facts,the outcome of the trial and the focus of controversy raised. The second part isthe case the focus of controversy theoretical analysis. Controversy in theoreticalcircles, for fraudulently stealing belongings behavior identified by firstintroduced the crime of fraud and theft crimes composition and characteristicsof the different judicial determination on the analysis of the two crimes;Followed by Implicated features on fraudulently steal property whether theyinvolve Implicated; Once again delivered violations of property rights in theproperty conduct a theoretical analysis, from the delivery of the property to stealproperty to the fraudulent acts of the criminal process behavior analysis judicialdetermination of such crimes. The third part is the study conclusions andthinking. Including the evaluation of the outcome of the trial, and steal propertybehavior identified key points summarize the thinking of the concreteapplication of the basic principles of law,"based on the facts, the law as theyardstick in such cases identified by fraudulent means. |
PDF Full Text Request