Reference And Evaluate To California Code Of Judicial Ethics

In recent years, the trust level of the court’ decisions is low in our nation, thisstation is related with what the impartiality of the judge and neutrality was relatedquestions. In judicial practice, judges’ behavior is always inconsistent with they status,they always can not keep impartiality and neutrality, for example, accept a party andhis lawyer banquets, and so on. The reason of the above situation may be various, oneof the important reasons is that the legal system of the regulation of judge’ behavior isnot perfect.This paper is titled with “reference and evaluate to California code of judicialethics”, and discussed the problem in four aspects. The first part is the legislationhistory of California code of judicial ethics, this part mainly discuss the legislationhistory and legislative of California code of judicial ethics. The second part is mainlytalk about the special content of California code of judicial ethics. This part mainlyinvolves the judge’s official activities, political activities, financial activities, otherjudicial outside activities, and so on. The third part is talk about the processingmechanism of judge’s misconduct of California. This part include processingorgnization and information source, handle process of judge’ misconduct, reliefprocessing and the confidential (public) of relative information. The four part is talkabout the reference of California code of judicial ethics to our nation. It talk about therelevant law of this topic in our nation and the shortcomings. This part divided intotwo part, namely the reference of California code of judicial ethics to our nation, andthe reference of processing mechanism of judge’s misconduct of California to ournation. In the part of the reference of California code of judicial ethics to our nation,The article pointed out that our country in the related provisions of related laws existto the judge, the dispersion and repeatability, the business activities of the legislationregulating the unreasonable and administrative duties to the judge, the lack ofregulation and the judge’s family member’s regulation is not reasonable four defects.In the part of the reference of processing mechanism of judge’s misconduct ofCalifornia to our nation, the article points out that China’s current judge formisconduct processing mechanism in handling the department of neutrality, thestandards of proof is not clear, the administrative relief program etc, and put forwardthe corresponding solutions.