To Kidnap Ransom How Qualitative Way

In judicial practice, the public security organs of the three larger differences in the kidnapping, robbery, three counts of extortion identified because of the three counts of the crime itself, constitute a consistent place. Three violations of the object is more complex, not only destroyed public and private property ownership, but also a violation of personal rights and interests of citizens. From a subjective point of view are the direct intent, and have the purpose of illegal possession of public or private property; There are many similarities in objective terms, are likely to employ violence, coercion or other means, are likely to spot obtaining property.For this promiscuous behavior of a variety of situations, and how positive uncertainty is often faced with the problem of judicial practice, because there will be a qualitative difference between the different sentencing to determine the fate of the perpetrator. Therefore, the right to proper conviction and sentencing of the perpetrator and protect human behavior not only of great theoretical significance, but also of great practical significance. this paper the case, for example, for the crime of kidnapping, comparative analysis robbery, extortion using methods similar to summarize their differences, pointed out the problems behind the case, the full text of about15,000words. The main content is divided into four parts:The first part of the case involving judicial practice of kidnapping, robbery, extortion, puts forward the case of the contentious issues as the main object of study. The second part of the reason for the qualitative differences between the three organs from three basic structures of sin look. The third part of the inquiry from the essential characteristics of the three reasons for the crime of disagreement. The fourth part of the essential characteristics of the three-way Analysis of crime cases.