| Linguistics is an old and young subjects. The development of Chinese linguistics, from the so-called "Literature" in the establishment of modern linguistics experienced a long historical process. The documented linguistic source, in the end where to start is a controversial topic. Wang Li believes that the May Fourth stage, before a philological research, and then is the real range of linguistic research. The Mr. He Jiuying philology and linguistics coexist in the ancient and modern. This view is a lot of language scholars agree, and we think this is a relatively objective view.To of Mr. He Jiuying the view to look, we can easily find the Spring and Autumn Period some of our scholars, some language theory problems, has been found and done relative depth exposition. This is embodied in the name real relationship "discussion was quite popular. This discussion, culminating in the Mohist and the famous debate. The name real relationship "as the core, the Mohist and the famous two schools a vibrant debate on the issues. This on the relationship between the two inextricably linked, but also because the debate has become more closely.We talked about "Mojing" and "Gongsun linguistic thinking, naturally encountered an unavoidable problem:What is the" thought"? Among the pre-Qin literature, we often see some scholars the issue of language. For example, Xi public "Guliang· Twenty-two years", said:had for others, the words also; person can not say why the man?"We can learn from in rationalize the mean, as a person the most essential sign of "words". So, can we not just according to this sentence, he said, this book there is a language thought it? It is clear that such an argument is too thin, the lack of further argument, we can not help but suspect that this narrative is based on feeling and intuition."Thought" Some scholars believe that several criteria are met:1, an idea that it should have specific submitter to have liquidity, dissemination and interactions. He can not be isolated, without any exchange, we should have the recipients, feedback, split difficult.2, repeatedly raised the same issue, and try to give answers, flow not only in appearance but also try to answer:What is the ultimate reason?3, some basic concepts and define these concepts, there are clearly defined expectations.4, the thought process gradually, and as a system. Recorded in the text, to pass to future generations. To measure "Mojing" and "Gongsun these standards, we can not deny which contains a wealth of language ideology.This article is divided into three parts, the Mo Jing "and" the Gongsun language thinking for comparison.The first part is the introduction of the Mojing and Mozi and Gongsun Gongsun Long introduction, outlining the current research and thesis significance, and description of the research material.The second part of the article focuses on linguistic thinking "Mojing" and "Gongsun compared from different angles, can be divided into three chapters.The first chapter in terms of language symbols and the philosophy of language for comparison. Combing two books prescribed different understanding of the concept of different views of the relationship Between name. Identify of two books Baimafeima, Firmness and White, as well as two books "means" different views.Chapter II from the perspective of language itself and language application ideas for comparison. Pointed out that the respective names and characteristics of the two books word terms, concept of language analysis of two books and two books focus on language issues.The third Chapter from the ideological origins of the comparison. Combing books ideological origins of health, which relates to different scholars of the pre-Qin period of the relevant issues. Analysis of the relationship of the two books in the history of language ideology.The third part is the conclusion. General article’s research, and theoretical and practical significance of the article will be described. |
PDF Full Text Request