Typical Cases From Ikunori Moral Justice

In practice, many cases sparked controversy in the final analysis is the debateabout the morality of justice. Judicial contain moral factor, which is an unavoidablefact, throughout the judicial process should also ethical considerations, it is a moral tobe realized, to carry forward the process of justice. Judicial impartiality itself withmoral tone, in addition to judicial justice to a rational value judgments, the judiciaryshould also inspire people to perform good deeds for its virtues. The law can not denyits moral background, the same judicial ethical considerations are also essential, shouldhave the moral justice. But in reality, the grasp of moral justice also achieve areasonable and moderate, resulting in distortion of the morality of justice, judicialresponses and did not play a role in promoting social morality. Justice is the most vividreproduction of the law in the form of judicial process and the results have a profoundimpact on people’s ideas and behaviors, laws in order to reflect its role in the evaluationand guidance. Rule of law, only " good law " is not enough, we must also make the lawto get a good application, which should be judicial duties. Therefore, it is necessary tocorrectly define the morality of justice, and efforts to make that happen. First, themorality of justice can not be missing rational law, but as a rational premise, whichconsider moral factors, and make appropriate, in line with the mainstream values ofsocial judgment. Has thus to achieve the social function of law, promote the social andmoral progress, thereby promoting overall social progress.