An Analysis On The Regulatory Issues On Live Broadcast Of Court Trial In China

Judicial corruption and the abuse of judicial power and other problems there are numerous factors that have their deeper reason, improve regulation of the trial live, although not cure these problems, but still can not ignore the positive sense it brings. In practice, not just for the trial of major cases performed live, but also include a number of people around the place in a small case, and implement its principles of open trial plays an essential role in making the media, freedom of expression, informed the right to be realized, the public can better supervise judicial activities and to enhance the image of the authority of justice and the judicial system. That everything has two sides, the trial live is no exception, there are advantages and disadvantages. Trial in practice live in a lot of questions were summarized as follows:to live the kind of cases uncertain, live content is not comprehensive enough, and a mere formality and the impact of the trial process and order three categories.The current domestic legislation for the trial live also just trial "Criminal Procedure Law" Section183under the principle of openness "Anything related to state secrets, personal privacy and the party applying for private commercial secrets case is not open to the public hearing.", section274" trial where the defendant is under18years of cases heard in public.","regulations on the strict implementation of the system of public trial" in the first11,"according to a public hearing of the case, by the people’s court, news reporters can record, recording video, photography, broadcast the trial live." and "People’s Court of the Supreme Court judgment on strengthening the work of a number of public opinion," Article23" Higher People’s Court approved the trial live body,"the relevant regulations. Through the existing domestic law order, found that the current status of the relevant legislation is not enough to solve new problems emerging reality. Therefore, the trial live sound regulation is feasible and positive significance. In this paper, the trial of both the public and the principle of judicial independence in the value placed be weighed against the trial live, and thus affirm the trial live this way open trial on the basis of positive significance for three issues were appearing live trial presented limit the scope of the trial live cases to achieve a comprehensive live broadcast of the trial as well as improve procedural Conditions three proposals to be perfect for live trial related regulations.